Hi All
I am putting together a belt preamp for a new Takamine Triax pickup (LR Baggs M1 essentially) for my acoustic. This pickup has an output of around 100mV maximum and therefore I need a little over 20dB of gain. I also want a volume control and low output impedance. I have put together the circuit below based on a OPA2134 op-amp (a little over kill for this app, but I need the headroom and very low noise)
I wondered if you could advise if it would be better to configure the input op-amp as unity gain and use the op-amp after the volume pot to provide all the gain, or as shown, share the gain between both op-amp sections? I am thinking that if the input op-amp had less output, this may lower any pot noise when adjusting the volume?
Also do you guys and girls think the component values I have in the feedback loops etc will result in good low noise and good fidelity operation?
Any improvement suggestions are very welcome!
Cheers
Ray
I am putting together a belt preamp for a new Takamine Triax pickup (LR Baggs M1 essentially) for my acoustic. This pickup has an output of around 100mV maximum and therefore I need a little over 20dB of gain. I also want a volume control and low output impedance. I have put together the circuit below based on a OPA2134 op-amp (a little over kill for this app, but I need the headroom and very low noise)
An externally hosted image should be here but it was not working when we last tested it.
I wondered if you could advise if it would be better to configure the input op-amp as unity gain and use the op-amp after the volume pot to provide all the gain, or as shown, share the gain between both op-amp sections? I am thinking that if the input op-amp had less output, this may lower any pot noise when adjusting the volume?
Also do you guys and girls think the component values I have in the feedback loops etc will result in good low noise and good fidelity operation?
Any improvement suggestions are very welcome!
Cheers
Ray
I would have thought either way would make no difference at all - as would using a single opamp with a 4.7K pot on the output.
Hi Nigel
How are you doing and thanks for your reply!
I wanted to put the volume pot in front of the op-amp on the output so that I always have an unaltered high impedance input and low impedance output. With a pot directly across the output, the output impedance will alter depending on the pot setting and generally always be higher than without the pot.
If I use the first op-amp as unity gain (so just a buffer), do you see any noise problems, or other, with running the second op-amp at the required 20dB gain?
Cheers
Ray
How are you doing and thanks for your reply!
I wanted to put the volume pot in front of the op-amp on the output so that I always have an unaltered high impedance input and low impedance output. With a pot directly across the output, the output impedance will alter depending on the pot setting and generally always be higher than without the pot.
If I use the first op-amp as unity gain (so just a buffer), do you see any noise problems, or other, with running the second op-amp at the required 20dB gain?
Cheers
Ray
Hi Nigel
How are you doing and thanks for your reply!
I wanted to put the volume pot in front of the op-amp on the output so that I always have an unaltered high impedance input and low impedance output. With a pot directly across the output, the output impedance will alter depending on the pot setting and generally always be higher than without the pot.
That's why I specified a 4.7K pot, that's low enough to fed the 20K input impedance of the following amplifier.
If I use the first op-amp as unity gain (so just a buffer), do you see any noise problems, or other, with running the second op-amp at the required 20dB gain?
Like I said, it makes no difference at all - you're only talking about very low gain figures, and a high signal level to begin with.
I doubt you will be able to hear any difference no matter how you do it, not measure any difference either (including the single opamp version with a 4.7K pot).
- Status
- Not open for further replies.