Please check my crossover design

Hi, I'm building my first set of speakers using a set of Faital 12FH500-4 horns and Faital HF206-6 compression drivers. I am using these components primarily because I got them ridiculously cheap and I've heard goods things about Faital. I plan to use a sealed enclosure.

I've never designed a crossover before, so I'm hoping if folks could chime in on the the attached photo, which shows my proposed design. I want to reduce the horn volume by 6db to start, so I included an L-pad. I also included a zobel on the woofer. The crossover point is 1,000hz.

Thanks for your help.
20241007_113111.jpg
 
There are many ways to model, ultimately using measurments but if this is your first time you might consider getting the factory responses and impedance data from the manufacturer and turning them into data files to use in a simulator. Example of simulators include Xsim and vituixcad.

The position this puts you in is tuning the crossover network to shape the responses. Keep in mind the effect of the baffle. Once you gain experience you can expand into the other areas of crossover design such as the physical aspects.
 
The results that you have provided indicate that the horn tweeter is running about 5dB too hot. That's not surprising, as the SPL data for the two drivers that you are using indicates a 10dB difference in their sensitivities.

You will need a more complex circuit that includes some equalization of the horn tweeter's response. If you just pad down the tweeter's response a bit more, then you will encounter premature high-frequency roll-off. That's not unusual, as after seeing a JBL design, it seems that compression drivers and their horns require quite a bit of EQ to get to a reasonably flat response in their design passband.
 
I plan to use this Eminence horn from Parts-Express.
290-551
[td]Eminence H2EA 2" Cast Aluminum Exponential Horn 60x40[/td]

I've heard that the horn reduces the compression driver by a few dB. Any way to model that in Vituix?

I'll also look into model the baffle diffraction. That might take some research.
 
Yes, used the Faital data. Here is the revised sim based on your revised design above. Thoughts on this as a starting point for my build? I figure that after I have the cabinets built I can test it with this and then adjust values as needed. Does that make sense?
Screenshot 2024-10-08 173506.png
 
You mentioned that you want to build a closed box. Do you already have an idea of the net volume for the 12HF500?
In any case, you will lose approx. 6dB of SPL in the low pass due to the baffle step, which means that the values for the high pass must be adjusted accordingly. You also need to be careful with the impedance minimum at 200 Hz. It could be that your amplifier does not like the actual 3 ohms in the long term.

Otherwise, build a test cabinet and measure!
 
As mentioned, the impedance minimum at 200 hz might be partly adressed by assigning the correct resistance to the large coil 1,27mh. The value in VituixCAD seems a little too low for such a large coil. (I could be wrong here - maybe you have bougth a very expensive coil with low resitance? )

Also, the Z-value needs to be adjusted when the acoustic centers are from different distances in relation to the listener. That is usually the case. In the draft crossover the drivers are both assigned 0 as value.

Also as mentioned you need to adress the baffle step issue. At high frequencies, a loudspeaker tends to project sound only in the forward direction that is, it has a 2 pi hemispherical radiation. At low frequencies, a loudspeaker undergoes a transition by which it begins to radiate sound in all directions, or a 4 pi spherical radiation. Therefore the mid/treble region needs to be further surpressed in relation to the level in the bass . From which freq the mid/treble should be surpressed with approx 6db depends on your baffle width.

Moreover, consider to make the speaker a bass reflex speaker or the bass will roll off downwards from ca 100hz and you will need a subwoofer.
 
Last edited: