Parallel op amps

Status
Not open for further replies.
Interestingly i have never seen this done in commercial mc phono stages, which is the only spot where noise really matters. Apparently the increased complexity of routing and the added cost makes it unattractive compared to just adding a parallel transistor array at input. Remember, each opamp will need individual gain setting resistors and ps decoupling caps.
 
Joachim Gerhard has done it in one of his designs. I think he had 4 or 8 in parallel.
It's relatively expensive, not only in opamps but also in larger power requirements.

Linear Audio Vol 0.

Jan
 

Attachments

  • rabbit.PNG
    rabbit.PNG
    138.2 KB · Views: 853
Last edited:
Yes, as long as each op-amp has its own feedback network (as analog_sa already wrote) and there is a network at the output that averages the outputs of the individual op-amps. Mind you, only the equivalent input noise voltage goes down, the equivalent input noise current goes up.

A good example is the moving-coil version of the Elektor Supra 2.0, which uses four LT1028 stages. An exceptionally bad example is the moving-magnet version of the Elektor Supra 2.0. It also uses four LT1028 stages, but with moving-magnet impedances and LT1028 op-amps, noise current is very dominant, so connecting several stages in parallel is the worst thing you could do.
 
Last edited:
The principle is discussed quite completely in the original LT1028 data sheet.
The AD article has some content from there.

I have driven that quite far for a measurement amplifier, but then, the number
of op amp pairs actually populated is up to the user.

http://www.hoffmann-hochfrequenz.de/downloads/lono.pdf

When I find the password for my web site, I will upload an update.
There is an alternative FET version, too. Also under the theme
"Plowing with the power of a thousand chicken".

I'm not Joachim Gerhard.

cheers, Gerhard
 

Attachments

  • DSCN2557 pix 800.JPG
    DSCN2557 pix 800.JPG
    214.1 KB · Views: 2,523
Status
Not open for further replies.