O Audio plate amps

Status
Not open for further replies.
They are better than the PE ones because the PE ones have fixed high-pass filters.

In addition, the O-Audio 500W one also has a parametric equalizer (just one band though).

I have the 500W. I love it. It barely gets warm even when it's cranked.

If I had to do it all over, though, I'd get a rack amp. instead. But I'd stick to Class-H or D.
 
I looked at the specs for both the 300w and 500w OAudio plate ampson OAudio's web site and think DonoMan is wrong in two ways:
1. Either OAudio amps do not appear to have have a variable high pass filter as implied.
2. The PE 500w equivalent (URL=http://www.partsexpress.com/pe/showdetl.cfm?&Partnumber=300-806]Dayton HPSA500[/URL]) does have similar parametric equilizer (and similarly also doesn't have a high pass filter).

I went with the cheaper PE 240w plate amp because its roughly half the cost and and has provision for speaker and line level inputs. It has a fixed high pass filter set at 160 Hz for 8 ohms but I don't use it. The high pass filters in most(?) plate amps are invariably a simple 1st-order crossover that frequently requires the addition of a passive impedence flattening circuit for the satellite to maintain a flat freq. response.

I would hazard that the higher end 500w plate amps don't include a high pass filter because they count on you connecting your satellites to a HT receiver and solving the high pass crossover problem within the receiver.
 
simon dart said:
Hi Quickshift,

How did you get on with these?

Simon

Hiya,

Actually not too bad. They certainly seem to get the job done. Way powerful enough for what I need and they sound pretty clean. They are surprisingly small and light 🙂 I'm happy with them.

Both amps are in my mark II POC subs - 2 x Peerless XXLS 10" drivers per side in 75l enclosures tuned to 17.8 Hz.

I'll pop up a thread at some point as I'd be interested in feedback on the alignment I'm using.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.