Krell Ksa100

[purer]

An externally hosted image should be here but it was not working when we last tested it.

http://www.chat001.com/forum/purer/210267.html

My Art http://www.chat001.com/forum/purer

 

[halojoy]

Heavy, groovy Stuff!!

nice pictures

 

[leiade]

Schematics

Do you have schematics for the krell ksa100 if so just show it to us poor ugly hubbies.😎

 

[stokessd]

Is it just me, or do the outsides of the Krell amps look a lot more impressive than the insides?

Sheldon

 

[1/137]

Outside vs In

I agree. That was my immediate impression but I figured it was just me. It looks like something I have built in the past. The outside does look a LOT more impressive than the inside.

1/137

 

[Peter Daniel]

It's because that amp is a thing of a past. The new ones are as impressive inside as outside.😉

 

[jleaman]

how many transisters are in that amp peter that looks tobe alot man..

 

[Peter Daniel]

It's something like 218.

 

[jleaman]

is that per side or all .. eheh that is alot man.. OUCh there goes all your money to the hydro company.. : O )

 

[mikek]

with 218 bjts per channel, the mtbf must be near nil😱 anybody got reliability data for these beasties?🙂

 

[Morello]

Re: Schematics

Do you have schematics for the krell ksa100 if so just show it to us poor ugly hubbies.😎

I have schematics for KSA 100. I can send it to you if you like.

\Morello

 

[planet10]

The few times i have heard these, they didn't do anything for me...

dave

 

[leiade]

Outside

Remeber that it is the enclosure that is the· placer del oculos· so a welldone facplate is almost all.😉

 

[AKSA]

Dave wrote:

The few times i have heard these, they didn't do anything for me...

dave

I too have heard them and have to agree. OTOH, this is an old amp, an old design, must go back to the mid-eighties.

We should be tolerant; the technology has moved on.

Cheers,

Hugh

www.aksaonline.com

 

[jh6you]

It's something like 218.

Once, just once, I used PSU caps of as many as number of orchestra members.
Each cap was responsible for each instrument. Wow... But no more.

😉

 

[stokessd]

Dave wrote:



I too have heard them and have to agree. OTOH, this is an old amp, an old design, must go back to the mid-eighties.

We should be tolerant; the technology has moved on.

True, but music was still music and distortion was still distortion. There are some really good sounding audio components from that same timeframe.


Sheldon