• WARNING: Tube/Valve amplifiers use potentially LETHAL HIGH VOLTAGES.
    Building, troubleshooting and testing of these amplifiers should only be
    performed by someone who is thoroughly familiar with
    the safety precautions around high voltages.

Improvements in this riaa tube

Hello friends,
I have done this phono preamplifier, of Mr. Troels, which I am unsatisfied for its sound quality.
It is my first phono to valves and I am not an expert in this matter, I have made improvements but they are substantial, like Mr. Rod Colema's ht-hearte for heating, and PSU Mosfet HV Shunt Regs of SR. Salas.
Someone nice could tell me improvements that could be made ?, to improve its sound.
Regards
 

Attachments

  • RIAA-wiring.jpg
    RIAA-wiring.jpg
    105.6 KB · Views: 830
With those very small cathode resistances the current and the repartition of the voltages over the two first triodes is problematical.
And the coupling capacitors rather small as the electrolytics in the power supply.
Mona
 

Attachments

  • 6C45riaa.jpg
    6C45riaa.jpg
    84.5 KB · Views: 800
As I mentioned above, the psu is not that of the schematic is Simplistic Mosfet HV Shunt Regs, of S.R Salas, and the decoupling capacitors are Auricap of 1UF.
What improvements can be made with respect to the cathode resistors, higher or lower value?
 
With those very small cathode resistances the current and the repartition of the voltages over the two first triodes is problematical.
And the coupling capacitors rather small as the electrolytics in the power supply.
Mona

This is the measurement of the answer, after the modification that has advised me Ketje, It can be improved even more ?.
Thank you Ketje for your help has improved substantially
 

Attachments

  • Response  Measurement.png
    Response Measurement.png
    107.5 KB · Views: 440
In order to get 200volts on top of the first cascode the current in the 6k8 resistance has to be (255-200)/6k8=8mA.That's also the current in the triodes and that depends on the 60R4 cathode resistor.But not very reliable, so experiment with the cathode resistor to get 200volt on top.
For the second stage, with 12AX7, the 3k are better replaced with 1k2 to get more output drive.
Mona
 
In order to get 200volts on top of the first cascode the current in the 6k8 resistance has to be (255-200)/6k8=8mA.That's also the current in the triodes and that depends on the 60R4 cathode resistor.But not very reliable, so experiment with the cathode resistor to get 200volt on top.
For the second stage, with 12AX7, the 3k are better replaced with 1k2 to get more output drive.
Mona


Thanks Ketje, I will try it and comment the results.

Regards.
 
In order to get 200volts on top of the first cascode the current in the 6k8 resistance has to be (255-200)/6k8=8mA.That's also the current in the triodes and that depends on the 60R4 cathode resistor.But not very reliable, so experiment with the cathode resistor to get 200volt on top.
For the second stage, with 12AX7, the 3k are better replaced with 1k2 to get more output drive.
Mona
.

I have made the modifications but I have not had positive results, in reference to the sound quality.
I have found an excel here in the forum of our friend rjm, for the calculation of the equalization riaa, it is possible to say that I have put the components of my phono stage and it is not good.
 

Attachments

  • Original riaa equalization.png
    Original riaa equalization.png
    366.4 KB · Views: 339
.

I have made the modifications but I have not had positive results, in reference to the sound quality.
I have found an excel here in the forum of our friend rjm, for the calculation of the equalization riaa, it is possible to say that I have put the components of my phono stage and it is not good.


Here is a modification made by me.
Is this modification correct? Or is it not reliable?
 

Attachments

  • My modification.png
    My modification.png
    307.3 KB · Views: 334
The mod's i sugested where intended to get more headroom and output drive to prevent signal top cutting with strong signals, not to change the frequency response.
The correction network was ok.
What you do now is another way of making the filter, if well dimensioned, same result.
The Rout from the first stage is somewhat less than the 6k8 anode resistor, take 6k.
The Rin is the grid resistor of the next stage, 1M.
Resulting , with the same capacitors Ca=10n and Cb=100n, in Ra=67k and Rb=10k5.
Mona
 
The mod's i sugested where intended to get more headroom and output drive to prevent signal top cutting with strong signals, not to change the frequency response.
The correction network was ok.
What you do now is another way of making the filter, if well dimensioned, same result.
The Rout from the first stage is somewhat less than the 6k8 anode resistor, take 6k.
The Rin is the grid resistor of the next stage, 1M.
Resulting , with the same capacitors Ca=10n and Cb=100n, in Ra=67k and Rb=10k5.
Mona

Ketje thank you very much for your help, if I understand correctly, is correct modification that have attached in the scheme?
 

Attachments

  • Modification.png
    Modification.png
    271.4 KB · Views: 307