Help to transfer the voltage ml 360s

Hello everyone Please help me to switch the voltage of ml 360s to 230-240v. Who does not find it difficult to find a pad behind the sticker, pull it out and ring the short-circuited jumpers. Please help, I'm afraid to make a mistake with the voltage transfer myself.
Just write down which pins you have closed with each other
Screenshot_20221106_230408.jpg
.
 
According to the manual, changing the voltage cannot be done by the user, whatever this means.
Maybe it needs a change of tranformer, but also the mains frequency can be the cause since this frequency is measured in some ML’s, requiring a firmware update or a simple external 60Hz generator to fool the system.

Hans
 
According to the manual, changing the voltage cannot be done by the user, whatever this means.
Maybe it needs a change of tranformer, but also the mains frequency can be the cause since this frequency is measured in some ML’s, requiring a firmware update or a simple external 60Hz generator to fool the system.

Hans
Good afternoon, Hans!
The tension changes in chips, that's for sure. This chip has its own closed jumpers. There is no blocking of the network frequency in the 360s.
Transformers are multi-voltage.
And it is possible to switch 100v 110v 115v 120v 200v 220v 230v 240v.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_20221107_175055.jpg
    IMG_20221107_175055.jpg
    212.9 KB · Views: 84
I just need a 360s 230v or 240v owner.
So that he pulled out the pad and checked the closed jumpers. A matter of 5 minutes 🙂
 

Attachments

  • IMG_20221107_175431.jpg
    IMG_20221107_175431.jpg
    316 KB · Views: 83
  • IMG_20221107_175438.jpg
    IMG_20221107_175438.jpg
    324.5 KB · Views: 73
  • IMG_20221107_175232.jpg
    IMG_20221107_175232.jpg
    263.4 KB · Views: 75
  • IMG_20221107_175241.jpg
    IMG_20221107_175241.jpg
    251.8 KB · Views: 70
No sorry, I don’t have friends with a 360.
In the version you show 3-4 and 6-7 are connected. Is this for the 100V version ?

Hans
Yes, Hans, 3-4 and 6-7 are 100v.
200v only 1-2 are shorted.
By calculating the voltage drop, I set it to 1-2 and 4-5, but I think it's 215V 😐 tk transformers are heated to 50-55 degrees. Tk I have a voltage of 230v + so I want to switch to 230-240v.
 
Here is the original power scheme in full.
P5 is a pad with short-circuited jumpers.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_20221107_190838.jpg
    IMG_20221107_190838.jpg
    316.3 KB · Views: 71
  • IMG_20221107_190845.jpg
    IMG_20221107_190845.jpg
    211.4 KB · Views: 70
  • IMG_20221107_191143.jpg
    IMG_20221107_191143.jpg
    302.2 KB · Views: 75
  • IMG_20221107_191150.jpg
    IMG_20221107_191150.jpg
    367.5 KB · Views: 73
There are two transformers T1 and T30 that are 100% in parallel independent of the 8 pin plug.
So, we can concentrate on T1.
With 3-4 and 6-7 you have the two windings in T1 in parallel suited for 100 Volt.
Connecting 2-3 and 5-6 will then be suited for 120Volt.

Connecting the windings in series will change to 220V -240V, so just 4-7 for 220V and 1-2 for 240 Volt.

Hans
 
  • Like
Reactions: jan.didden
There are two transformers T1 and T30 that are 100% in parallel independent of the 8 pin plug.
So, we can concentrate on T1.
With 3-4 and 6-7 you have the two windings in T1 in parallel suited for 100 Volt.
Connecting 2-3 and 5-6 will then be suited for 120Volt.

Connecting the windings in series will change to 220V -240V, so just 4-7 for 220V and 1-2 for 240 Volt.

Hans
Hans, I was wrong. Here I marked the short-circuited jumpers with blue at 100v.
Pink at 200v.
И черным пометил маркером на 100в прямо на колодке.
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_20221107_192213.jpg
    Screenshot_20221107_192213.jpg
    55.7 KB · Views: 68
  • IMG_20221107_191541.jpg
    IMG_20221107_191541.jpg
    297.3 KB · Views: 58
Hans I got the wrong direction, sorry) you're right.please see if I am measuring the resistance correctly in the photo?
Between 4 and 7 is the highest resistance.
You should measure between 3 and 6 wile 4 and 7 are connected.
Then you will see a higher resistance between 3 and 6 as with 1 and 2 connected.
But be confident that 4-7 is the correct connection for you.

Hans
 
You should measure between 3 and 6 wile 4 and 7 are connected.
Then you will see a higher resistance between 3 and 6 as with 1 and 2 connected.
But be confident that 4-7 is the correct connection for you.

Hans
Hans, here's a photo. Did I measure it correctly? Yes, you are right, the resistance increased by 4-7 with 3-6 closed and amounted to 198 kohm.
The resistance is between 3 - 6 98ohm with closed 4-7.
Hans, did I understand correctly that I need two jumpers to put on 3-6 and 4-7 and I will have 240v? And how do I do it on 230v?
 

Attachments

  • IMG_20221107_222235.jpg
    IMG_20221107_222235.jpg
    265.4 KB · Views: 57
Last edited:
Hans, here's a photo. Did I measure it correctly? Yes, you are right, the resistance increased by 4-7 with 3-6 closed and amounted to 198 kohm.
The resistance is between 3 - 6 98ohm with closed 4-7.
Hans, did I understand correctly that I need two jumpers to put on 3-6 and 4-7 and I will have 240v? And how do I do it on 230v?
3 and 6 are the points where mains enters the 360.
All you have to do is to only connect 4 to 7, that’s it and it will go for 220 for 240 Volt, so with 230 Volt you are fine.

Hans
 
3 and 6 are the points where mains enters the 360.
All you have to do is to only connect 4 to 7, that’s it and it will go for 220 for 240 Volt, so with 230 Volt you are fine.

Hans
Good afternoon, Hans! Yesterday I was afraid to put a jumper in 4-7 🙂
Because I don't understand how the board track could pass from 4 to 7, because on the way 5 and 6 ...
I decided to carefully open the body of the 200v jumper. And I saw that on each side of the board there are numbers with voltage. I think this is a universal power supply board and the voltage will depend on which side to solder the jumpers. Look at the photo.
There are numbers 100v 120v 220v and 240v on the board.
Is it possible that you made a mistake with 4 and 7?
 

Attachments

  • IMG_20221108_171525.jpg
    IMG_20221108_171525.jpg
    301.6 KB · Views: 53
  • IMG_20221108_171512.jpg
    IMG_20221108_171512.jpg
    327.4 KB · Views: 55
  • IMG_20221108_171920.jpg
    IMG_20221108_171920.jpg
    302.4 KB · Views: 54
  • IMG_20221108_172006.jpg
    IMG_20221108_172006.jpg
    290.2 KB · Views: 62