Helios textreme

Hi all,
Putting together a feasibility to build the Helios tx project.
Can anyone enlighten me on the part specs for the crossovers, in particular the resistors? Wondering if they are 3k, 12k,5k,3.9k ?

Thanks, David
1720064492341.jpeg
 
Last edited:
Can anyone enlighten me on the part specs for the crossovers, in particular the resistors? Wondering if they are 3k, 12k,5k,3.9k ?
R1= 5 Ohm
R2 = 3 Ohm
R3 = 3,9 Ohm
R4 = 12 Ohm

Resistors are missing the Wattage ratings from the schematic, in general anything under 5 Watts resistors are not suited for the purpose of speaker XO's 10-20 W is probably more suitable for this application. Higher wattage means the resistors can dissipate more effect before they burn up, and generally they will heat up less and be bigger in size.


L1 = 3,01 milli Henries
L2 = 400 mikro Henries
L3 = 1,5 mH

Inductors are denoted with gauge and type, but the resistance will only be in the ballpark without values

C1 = 2,2 mikro Farad
C2 = 8,2 mikro Farad
C3 = 17 mikro Farad


The schematic is done with X-sim which is free crossover simulator software, to download fx :
https://xsim.software.informer.com/

Try and download it and make the circuit if you cna find the .FRD and .ZMA files for the drivers in question.
There are 100's of pages of threads on the software on here.

Most these days will look at using VituixCad instead of Xsim, as it is a more complete software package for a design.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Davidallen
For the resistors they are R1=5ohm, R2=3ohm, R3=3.9ohm, R4=12ohm. You should be looking at 10W rating for the tweeter and posibly 20W rating for the Woofer but you can simulate in Vituix and see what power is ping through each component.

If not just ask Javad Shadzi on the facebook DIY Loudpeaker Pad on Facebook.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Davidallen and Arez
R1= 5 Ohm
R2 = 3 Ohm
R3 = 3,9 Ohm
R4 = 12 Ohm

Resistors are missing the Wattage ratings from the schematic, in general anything under 5 Watts resistors are not suited for the purpose of speaker XO's 10-20 W is probably more suitable for this application. Higher wattage means the resistors can dissipate more effect before they burn up, and generally they will heat up less and be bigger in size.


L1 = 3,01 milli Henries
L2 = 400 mikro Henries
L3 = 1,5 mH

Inductors are denoted with gauge and type, but the resistance will only be in the ballpark without values

C1 = 2,2 mikro Farad
C2 = 8,2 mikro Farad
C3 = 17 mikro Farad


The schematic is done with X-sim which is free crossover simulator software, to download fx :
https://xsim.software.informer.com/

Try and download it and make the circuit if you cna find the .FRD and .ZMA files for the drivers in question.
There are 100's of pages of threads on the software on here.

Most these days will look at using VituixCad instead of Xsim, as it is a more complete software package for a design.
Unfortunately I don’t think I can download the programs to an iPad Or so I’ve been told.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Arez
L1 has a description of 3.01mh 16 gauge iron laminate. Does that mean iron core. Looking at the picture it doesn’t appear to be iron core
It won't really make much difference. There's only 0.2 ohms DCR difference between the aircore and iron core. The iron core being the lower DCR (DC resistance). There are some that claim they can hear the difference between air and iron core. If given the option, aircore inductors are preferred unless very large inductance is required or lower impedance is needed to reduce losses. so Madisound using an aircore 14awg is perfectly fine.

PS: I wouldn't bother downloading XSim and trying to replicate the crossover, using some random FRD/ZMA data. There's no point. you wont' match reality for a number of reasons and you can't really improve on this design. If Javad had the successful Beryllium version as a benchmark, then it's likely optimised.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bambadoo
No I haven't built it nor listened to it. However, I don't recall anyone saying anything bad about the Beryllium version and Jeff Bagby said it was the best 2 way he'd ever designed. He didn't seem to be the kind to brag either, just honest. The Textreme version is quite new.
 
There appears to be no timeframe on the release of the TXNWG
Madisound writes: We just received word that the first production run of the TW29TXNWG-4 tweeter used in this design is scheduled, and we should have them in stock by the end of July.

Not sure if this is an official launch or if the first run is earmarked for Madisound and the Helios kit, but at least it is a start 🙂
 
  • Like
Reactions: Davidallen