Sorry, I have no measurement facility. I tried another two leg crystal it's ok.. but with another four-leg type of oscillator which I sure that is working, faster playback again.. I think there is a reason for using ordinary two-leg types of crystals with these cards.
Perhaps the chip runs at half the frequency of the crystal nominal value? I know crystals can run at multiples (harmonics), but I am not sure about fractions.
Perhaps the chip runs at half the frequency of the crystal nominal value? I know crystals can run at multiples (harmonics), but I am not sure about fractions.
Your direction gave me an idea..
I measured playback time vs. actual time, then i realize that there is exact 1/4 delay. Then actual clock must be 4/3 of 24.576, which means 18.432 mhz.. Now I have to find a oscillator to try with this value.
Your direction gave me an idea..
I measured playback time vs. actual time, then i realize that there is exact 1/4 delay. Then actual clock must be 4/3 of 24.576, which means 18.432 mhz.. Now I have to find a oscillator to try with this value.
The required oscillator frequency is 24.576MHZ, the same as the Xtal that you removed.
Download the data sheet for the DIR9001, and have a look at fig.9.
It should be fairly similar to what you have. You could also try a series resistor of 47-100 ohms in series with the output of your new oscillator.
SandyK
The required oscillator frequency is 24.576MHZ, the same as the Xtal that you removed.
Download the data sheet for the DIR9001, and have a look at fig.9.
It should be fairly similar to what you have. You could also try a series resistor of 47-100 ohms in series with the output of your new oscillator.
SandyK
That is what i have done exactly.. I have used 24.576mhz oscillator. Also tried 100ohm resistor in series but it scratched the playback completely. If you sure that i have to use 24.576mhz, then have you any idea of exact 1/4 delay?
That is what i have done exactly.. I have used 24.576mhz oscillator. Also tried 100ohm resistor in series but it scratched the playback completely. If you sure that i have to use 24.576mhz, then have you any idea of exact 1/4 delay?
terranigma
Sorry, but I do not know what is causing your problem. Perhaps the waveform isn't correct, or it is of incorrect amplitude? It seems to be a pretty standard type of oscillator input as used with many different I.C.s.
I recently replaced a simple xtal oscillator as shown in the DIR9001 data sheet with a 3.3V 24.576MHZ oscillator module in a DAC without any problems.
SandyK
To me that happens if I select bitmatched playback and I forget to change in Windows the 48kHz samplerate to 44.1kHz. Don't know why there are not in sync when bitmatched is selected (but they are sync'ed when I force the sound card on a certain samplerate). But the speed difference is then 48/44.1...
The value of 24.576MHz seems correct since it is 512 multiple of 48kHz (256 of 96kHz), and that's the native samplerates of X-Fi.
The value of 24.576MHz seems correct since it is 512 multiple of 48kHz (256 of 96kHz), and that's the native samplerates of X-Fi.
Last edited:
To me that happens if I select bitmatched playback and I forget to change in Windows the 48kHz samplerate to 44.1kHz. Don't know why there are not in sync when bitmatched is selected (but they are sync'ed when I force the sound card on a certain samplerate). But the speed difference is then 48/44.1...
The value of 24.576MHz seems correct since it is 512 multiple of 48kHz (256 of 96kHz), and that's the native samplerates of X-Fi.
Yes..that was it. Since i'm using ASIO as output, samplerate and masterclock varies dynamically. Weird thing that in my setup, if you ever play a 44100 track, there was no fallback for normal operation even you play a 48k track. You have to reboot. I just added SoX resampler to DSP list and everything seems fine..
Thank you all.
And hope to software resampler (Sox what i use) would rival X-fi's hw resampler. Because hw resampler completely out of function after removing crystal. Sox resampler seems one of the best out there.
SRC Comparisons
SRC Comparisons
- Status
- Not open for further replies.
- Home
- Source & Line
- PC Based
- Fast playback after replacing oscillator of X-Fi