Best electrolytics for power supply

Status
Not open for further replies.
Hi all,

I have a dual split supply for a class A amp which I would like to upgrade.
When I started with the project I used "cheap" electrolytics as I was not sure at the time what type of power supply I would end up with (CRC, CLC, regulated, cap multiplier). The plan was to upgrade components such as capacitors once I was sure about the make-up of the power supply.

Well I ended up with a simple CRC and I think it is adequate. There is no hum from the supply as the amp has a pretty good PSRR.

Q: I have decided on 3 types of electrolytics and would like to know what would be best sounding. Elna silmic 2, Nichicon KG gold tune, Mundorf Mlytic AG.

I currently have 54mF per rail (8 x 6800uF) which my PCB allows for.

I have read many reviews regarding Elna's in the power supply being superior but they are quite expensive and the biggest value is 3300uF at 50V. Thus (8 x 3300uF = 26.4mF).

The Mundorfs I can get 6800uF so would have 54mF / rail.

The Nichicons KG's are the cheapest and 6800uF are also available.

I have also considered mixing Nichicon and elna's 4 of each, would this be any good?

Any suggestions from people with actual experience (not the theory on low ESR etc.) would be much appreciated.

Thanks
 
Last edited:
Use whatever you can source easily, you can afford and will fit your PCB. They're all quite nice. For a serious PSU you can consider Panasonic as well. You can get Panasonic and Mundorf in lower profile (shorter) sizes as well, which can make them a lot more convenient sometimes. IIRC the Elnas and the Nichicons tend to be quite tall at higher capacities.

I prefer the Mundorfs, because they're prettier 😛
 
I have this pet theory that the first C of a CLC or CRC is there just to smooth the mains. It's most arduous duty is handling ripple current. Select for that alone.

The last C of a CLC or CRC is connected directly to the amplifier. It has the most profound effect on amplifier performance after the on board decoupling. Select the last C for sound quality/amp performance.
The amp is to some extent isolated from the first C by that impedance (L or C) and thus has far less effect on performance.

But I tend to use normal, commercial, cheap, caps for the whole PSU. I only get pernickety with the decoupling caps which must be located and type chosen to perform correctly.
 
Well,. let's put it this way. I'm using Panasonic caps in my chipamp and it sounds perfectly fine. Nothing fancy is in the supply there.

I'm using Mundorfs in my DCB1 and it's an absolutely brilliant buffer preamp. To be fair though, it's got a nice shunt regulator so I could have stuck anything in their place and it it wouldn't make a difference as long as my voltage didn't sag drastically.

But if you've got money to spare, packaging does matter, studies have proven. At least inside your brain 🙂
 
Thanks Andrew, this is the sort of information I am after. I have decoupling 100nF panasonic polyprops on each of the "cheaper" commercial electrolytics at the moment. Do you think I would have an sonic benefit by replacing lets say the last 4 caps with more expensive audio rated electrolytics?
 
Well,. let's put it this way. I'm using Panasonic caps in my chipamp and it sounds perfectly fine. Nothing fancy is in the supply there.

I'm using Mundorfs in my DCB1 and it's an absolutely brilliant buffer preamp. To be fair though, it's got a nice shunt regulator so I could have stuck anything in their place and it it wouldn't make a difference as long as my voltage didn't sag drastically.

But if you've got money to spare, packaging does matter, studies have proven. At least inside your brain 🙂

Hi Atilla, I did a google search on electrolytics in power supplies and which sounded better if at all. The article I stumbled upon tested a pre-amp with regulated supply. The guy had 5 types of caps of which the 3 I mentioned were part of. These caps were before the regulator and they were switched in with a 5 way switch so that he could do A-B-C-D-E testing.

Now I would also have thought that caps before the regulator could'nt have an effect on audio but according to his tests it did and he concluded the Elna's to be best sounding before black-gate and the rest.

I was amazed...or rather confused 😕
 
Last edited:
Ah, right. The latest edition of Linear audio has a great article on tests like that and how to draw conclusions on the results. Or more like how not to draw conclusions on the results.

I'm not touching the 'subjectively perceived benefits of power supply capacitors brand' with a 10-foot pole.

Following what AndrewT says here is what I've mostly been doing and then getting good quality caps - in terms of ESR, tolerance, reliability - when possible.

Mr. Pass says he likes Elnas for where he has to use electrolytics, so I've used them here and there. There's no chance in hell I'll make a PSU out of Slimic2 though, unless I strike some fantastic bargain. There are cheaper ways to make a power supply than that.
 
There is no such thing as audio quality power supply capacitors. They are a power storage device. For a given capacitance, you want the lowest possible ESR. Sometimes this can be achieved with multiple smaller capacitors in parallel (ESR is reduced like resistors in parallel), or sometimes a larger capacitor will have less ESR. You have to check the specs.

Make your choice of power supply capacitors based on ESR not some imagined sound quality.
 
I like Panasonic TSHA caps in the PS. Good specs, not expensive, readily available in many sizes from Digikey. I've found that a bypass with a 4.7uF or even a little larger film cap like a Solen helps remove any edginess from the sound; smaller bypasses like .01uF alone don't seem to do much of anything IMHO.
 
I like Panasonic TSHA caps in the PS. Good specs, not expensive, readily available in many sizes from Digikey. I've found that a bypass with a 4.7uF or even a little larger film cap like a Solen helps remove any edginess from the sound; smaller bypasses like .01uF alone don't seem to do much of anything IMHO.

There's a very extensive thread here, showing how those really small 'bypasses' create mostly problems. Oscilloscope shots included and everything. This is going off-topic now, but if you're interested just search in the PS section.
 
Check out Rifa's; low esr and a very long life span.

x2 fantastic caps, use them wherever i have room as yes you need a particular pcb to mount them and are best for using buss bar.

however you can get caps that are very much like the mundorf M-Lytic for less money, in fact some say they are the company that make them for mundorf as an OEM called F&T.
however i still often use mundorf because they are prettier =)

for serious power supply duties peh169, panasonics and if the budget is there and the room, forget electrolytic, get un-lytic or united chemicon large bulk polypropylene films screw type DC storage caps

ESR? ...what ESR?
 
Last edited:
however you can get caps that are very much like the mundorf M-Lytic for less money, in fact some say they are the company that make them for mundorf as an OEM called F&T.

Isn't there a problem with the availability of F&T caps ?
On 'fleaBay' the are basically nonexistent, the bigger electronic shops are no better.

I've seen them only on two UK web pages, the capacity and voltage range of them wasn't jaw-dropping.
 
There is no such thing as audio quality power supply capacitors. They are a power storage device. For a given capacitance, you want the lowest possible ESR. Sometimes this can be achieved with multiple smaller capacitors in parallel (ESR is reduced like resistors in parallel), or sometimes a larger capacitor will have less ESR. You have to check the specs.

Make your choice of power supply capacitors based on ESR not some imagined sound quality.

nope
 
Status
Not open for further replies.