Are there any drawbacks upon building an Aleph clone all with BJTs ?
Like
- KSA1220A/MJE350 in the input stage with MJE15033 as current source
- Darlingtons MJ11032/MJ11016 or "custom darlingotns" with MJE243+MJ15003 or MJL3281
I'm simulating such a configuration and it seems to work ok, at least for DC operating point and transient analysis.
Thank You
Like
- KSA1220A/MJE350 in the input stage with MJE15033 as current source
- Darlingtons MJ11032/MJ11016 or "custom darlingotns" with MJE243+MJ15003 or MJL3281
I'm simulating such a configuration and it seems to work ok, at least for DC operating point and transient analysis.
Thank You
And ....
How about and AlephX in BJT flavour ?
Has anyone tried (built / simulated) this ?
Dave
Mambo wrote
Are there any drawbacks upon building an Aleph clone all with BJTs ?
Nelson Pass wrote
No reason why it couldn't work.
How about and AlephX in BJT flavour ?
Has anyone tried (built / simulated) this ?
Dave
Mosfets are favored because of their high input impedance
and also because their high Vgs makes it easy to insert control
circuits that operate at 4 volts or so, rather than the 1.4 volts
seen in a darlington.
and also because their high Vgs makes it easy to insert control
circuits that operate at 4 volts or so, rather than the 1.4 volts
seen in a darlington.
The lower input ipedance of BJT requires higher current from the input differential pair; I'm getting good results (in simulation) with about 25 mA each.
Due to their lower Collector-Emiter on resistence BJTs should give you a lower output impedence also for low power versions of the clones (A5 and A3) and thus a better control like the big Aleph 1.2 and 2.
Due to their lower Collector-Emiter on resistence BJTs should give you a lower output impedence also for low power versions of the clones (A5 and A3) and thus a better control like the big Aleph 1.2 and 2.
- Status
- Not open for further replies.