• WARNING: Tube/Valve amplifiers use potentially LETHAL HIGH VOLTAGES.
    Building, troubleshooting and testing of these amplifiers should only be
    performed by someone who is thoroughly familiar with
    the safety precautions around high voltages.

Sonic Downside to 83 Rectifier

Hey you all, just looking for perspective here. I'm collecting parts to monoblock SE 2A3's and understand full well that 83 rectification (800V/250mA max) is gross overkill. That said, I have a bunch in my stash, but wonder about what if any negative sonic impact might result. As info, years ago I had a pair of Loesch Triple (parallel) 2A3's outfitted with 83's that sounded, well, pretty damn good as you might expect from the designer. Appreciate any advice you might offer.
 
... but wonder about what if any negative sonic impact might result.
That depends entirely on how you build it. The traditional issues with MV rectifiers need to be addressed. That usually means a shielded rectifier and appropriate RF decoupling. Do that and there shouldn't be any negative impacts. Other than having to wait for the rectifier to warm up before you can listen to your amp. 😉
 
  • Like
Reactions: jimalbano32
Thanks! I should be safe. I always wear sunglasses while listening. 😎 I find that they improve bass performance by perhaps 20 - 25%. 30% on Saturdays. That said, thanks for the reminder about the pre-heating time. 15 to 30 minutes, as I understand it, before applying B+. Inconvenient, true. But I can always go back to a more conventional rectifier if it becomes too bothersome. Thanks for the response.
 
This is you? Awesome!

812vintage.promo_.jpg
 
Mercury vapor rectifiers do indeed produce UV radiation.
Regular glass however, is opaque for the most harmful short wavelength UVB and UVC.
Glass is semi-transparent for UVA ('blacklight') so some of that will get through.
Would be nice to know if it is enough to light up white clothing like in nightclubs 😎.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jimalbano32