I don't see that this has been posted anywhere so sorry if this is a repeat post
Quite easy, at least that's what my brother said, who does 3D printing. He was kinda surprised he used a square infill patternHow easynis it to change the infill geometry?
It's typically a selection of predetermined patterns with a selectable fill factor. This way managing an otherwise solid part of the build becomes the job of the slicer. It doesn't have to be this way but it's much easier.
He used square infill probably because it takes a lot less time than gyroid which is one of the strongestQuite easy, at least that's what my brother said, who does 3D printing. He was kinda surprised he used a square infill pattern
The gyroid, as it has an open structure, can be used to fill the enclosure volume. That way it breaks up resonance patterns, reducing the need for internal damping. This is an interesting case for that.it takes a lot less time than gyroid which is one of the strongest
Thanks for the link,The gyroid, as it has an open structure, can be used to fill the enclosure volume. That way it breaks up resonance patterns, reducing the need for internal damping. This is an interesting case for that.
Excellent
- Home
- Loudspeakers
- Multi-Way
- Infill percentage experiment for 3D printed speaker cabinets