SB Acoustics Coax

Frugal-phile™/Moderator
Joined 2001
Paid Member
https://audioxpress.com/article/tes...xial-driver-from-the-sb-acoustics-satori-line

https%3A%2F%2Faudioxpress.com%2Fassets%2Fupload%2Fimages%2F1%2F20250212173642_SBacoustics-MT19CP-8-Driver-TWeb.jpg


dave
 
Distortion looks to be excellent/low. I've heard good things about this driver and I'm interested in a build with it. The on-axis frequency response can be a bit scary at first but I think it will even out really well with the proper crossover and understanding of how a coax behaves. Plus, the benefits of a coax are going to outweigh the cons here. Satori is doing some good work.
 
The on-axis frequency response can be a bit scary at first but I think it will even out really well with the proper crossover and understanding of how a coax behaves.
From Dickason: on-axis trough 7-12khz bottom -8dB at 9.5khz; trough gone 30° off-axis. How would you use this driver's VHF response properly? (Not asking about XO.)

I did the KEF LS50 meta 1793 3rd-order/2nd-order and the VHF region was a challenge to get ruler flat (too).
 
Last edited:
From Dickason: on-axis trough 7-12khz bottom -8dB at 9.5khz; trough gone 30° off-axis. How would you use this driver's VHF response properly? (Not asking about XO.)

I did the KEF LS50 meta 1793 3rd-order/2nd-order and the VHF region was a challenge to get ruler flat (too).
I'm not exactly sure what I would do because I would have to have one and measure it myself in a cabinet. But I am not worried about the 9.5Khz dip because it evens out off-axis. So, I would just ignore that dip on axis and get everything else to be as flat as possible then use off-axis measurements to see what my in-room response would be. The in-room response is going to be the most important for me.
 
  • Like
Reactions: wchang