can you translate the attached document in to English?
It looks to me like the original specification is for 4.3H inductance with either 15 or 75 Ohms resistance, but I'm only guessing.
Where have you looked already?
Kind regards,
Drew
It looks to me like the original specification is for 4.3H inductance with either 15 or 75 Ohms resistance, but I'm only guessing.
Where have you looked already?
Kind regards,
Drew
There are alternate part numbers for the pot core, maybe still available? Might have to wind yourself.
The 1's and 7's are an issue - the pot core drawing seems to be very ambiguous, but the numbers at the top have a clear 7, different from the '15', so 15 ohms I guess.
The 1's and 7's are an issue - the pot core drawing seems to be very ambiguous, but the numbers at the top have a clear 7, different from the '15', so 15 ohms I guess.
Thanks.
In college, my engineering prof's encouraged us to cross our sevens to avoid such confusion, even though we Americans don't generally give our ones a flag.
Kind regards,
Drew
In college, my engineering prof's encouraged us to cross our sevens to avoid such confusion, even though we Americans don't generally give our ones a flag.
Kind regards,
Drew
For writing part numbers I always capitalize letters so a lower-case L can't be confused with a digit 1. Capital letter I's are usually clear enough (though some font's are awful for such distinctions). Yes you soon learn to cross 0's 4's and 7's in the real world when time and money depends on accuracy!
Annoyingly capitalizing leads possible confusion of S and 5 - I don't know an easy fix for this. Typewriter fonts used to use a small descender on some digits (including 5) for this reason I suspect.
Annoyingly capitalizing leads possible confusion of S and 5 - I don't know an easy fix for this. Typewriter fonts used to use a small descender on some digits (including 5) for this reason I suspect.