Hello all,
i looking to make a secondary system to put in my office. (i spend many hours) actually i have a pair of chr70 in stock i find them not very good against my MAOP10 and SB20
when i see the money i have put in my sb20FRPC30, it's wonderful even if the maop10 are better
the idea is to find like the sb20 something with a wonderfull price quality ratio.
i have seen aiyma drivers wich are cheap but i have never listen
i would like to make a low volume 2-15 liter internal boxes, or a mini onken or an affordable waw
What can you advise me?
i looking to make a secondary system to put in my office. (i spend many hours) actually i have a pair of chr70 in stock i find them not very good against my MAOP10 and SB20
when i see the money i have put in my sb20FRPC30, it's wonderful even if the maop10 are better
the idea is to find like the sb20 something with a wonderfull price quality ratio.
i have seen aiyma drivers wich are cheap but i have never listen
i would like to make a low volume 2-15 liter internal boxes, or a mini onken or an affordable waw
What can you advise me?
Last edited:
Mmmhhh... today I discovered an italian LSSC (loudspeaker scientific channel ) on YT
The guy has a site and is very productive, both videos and projects...which he sells 'documentation' about.
Dunno if it qualifies as a FR being a coaxial ( he's very fond of those) plus a PR. Sure it look a Seas, and it's little.
Oh, the link!
https://www.mikeborgheseaudio.com/shop/p/simbiosi
The guy has a site and is very productive, both videos and projects...which he sells 'documentation' about.
Dunno if it qualifies as a FR being a coaxial ( he's very fond of those) plus a PR. Sure it look a Seas, and it's little.
Oh, the link!
https://www.mikeborgheseaudio.com/shop/p/simbiosi
i'm not completly sure that a small spaeker will really move correctly the passive radiator. i prefer rest on my idea of a full rage.
i have forget to tell the speaker will not be really close to me not like computer speaker but at 2-3m in a 20 sqm room
i have forget to tell the speaker will not be really close to me not like computer speaker but at 2-3m in a 20 sqm room
Small speakers work fine with passive radiators, as long as the passive has proper specifications. I've used passive radiators with both the TB 2 inch (W2-2040S) and 3 inch (W3-1876S) "subwoofers" in enclosure volumes around half a liter. If you add excessive mass you lose output at lower frequencies, but the models show that as well so it's not an unexpected result. If you can't achieve low end performance similar to that of a vented enclosure, there's probably a mismatch between the driver/enclosure and passive radiator.
I use the old Enabled Alpair 7.3's in Planet10 Mar-ken boxes for my desktop. Of course, these drivers are long OOP, but the Pluvia 7.2 HD is supposed to be the closest driver in current production, so why try a pair. They are also inexpensive.i would like to make a low volume 5-15 liter internal boxes, or a mini onken or an affordable waw
jeff
je have listen that CHN-50P MICA are super evolution does the new chp 70 are also an evolution against pluvia? someone have listen?
Best price/performance: CHR/CHP-50 certainly would be serious candidates.
dave
dave
Last edited:
CHR-50? I have CHN-50. The paper version is by all comments, has the same kind of difference in vo cing and chracter as A6.2m/p, A10.3/p.
dave
dave
TC9FD or Scan 10F are reasonably linear and low distortion.
Thye Scan is good but pricey (note some are really just midranges), the TC9 is well liked, the ones i had sucked.
dave
Last edited:
does the CHN-50p mica will be as weet to listen that my maop10.2? because on this system there will not have any correction and directly corded to amp
is it usable alone or it's really for use with a sub?
Paper, so i expect a more vintage top, a bit more seductive than the metal cones thru the midrange and less DDR. The CHN would be considered among the low end if the range, A10.2 the top of the range witha price some 20x.
A Sub is needed ifyou need real bass — they should so a good job of faking it ie good at doing the first harmonic — or need to play louder.
dave
Due to the inherent limitations of full range drivers I could never see it being worth spending more than say what a TC9 costs.
Seems you sadly have not experienced what some pricier FRs are capable of.
No need to, not interested in beamy highs or IMD. I like neutral speakers with great dispersion and low diffraction which full rangers just can't deliver. Until someone manages to defy physics with one I do not see that changing anytime soon. Full range is just taking steps backwards in terms of audio reproduction.
reat dispersion and low diffraction which full rangers just can't deliver
You ight e surprised.
Gie. your requirements what are you even doing on the FR Forum?
dave
You might e surprised.
I wouldn't be.
Gie. your requirements what are you even doing on the FR Forum?
Giving suggestions on saving money, that ok with you? Why are you chronically online? Nothing better to do?
Last edited by a moderator:
- Home
- Loudspeakers
- Full Range
- 2.5 to 4 inch best price quality ratio