Why no such comparisons here? Too anxious about the results 🙂
Around 05:00 is a nice mid-tempo sequence for testing!
Greetz - The ReSultanz of Zound
Still unbeaten til today :
Around 05:00 is a nice mid-tempo sequence for testing!
Greetz - The ReSultanz of Zound
Still unbeaten til today :
Last edited:
How dare you!
You don't show any respect for people that are professionals! Very unprofessional such a reaction by you ...
So , dear sissie-master , would you even call Neumann KH150 also sissie-speakers?
https://www.audiosciencereview.com/forum/index.php?threads/neumann-kh-150-monitor-review.39922/
It seems if you got no arguments then an insult is all you got to make a point ...
But have a nice day anyway!
ps .. more intelligent communication please!
You don't show any respect for people that are professionals! Very unprofessional such a reaction by you ...
So , dear sissie-master , would you even call Neumann KH150 also sissie-speakers?
https://www.audiosciencereview.com/forum/index.php?threads/neumann-kh-150-monitor-review.39922/
It seems if you got no arguments then an insult is all you got to make a point ...
But have a nice day anyway!
ps .. more intelligent communication please!
p.s : this is a serious forum for serious Diyers , no place for hiden advertising or audioscience gurus and fanatics .. 😛
Yes, we must be more serious. This forum has too many discussions about frivolous matters concluding in chaos akin to a squirrel convention in a nut factory.
The KEF coaxial driver has a smooth dispersion pattern that is to my knowledge unmatched by any other manufacturer. Erin's Audio youTube channel shows some great measurement results. I think it has to do with the waveguide fins in front of the tweeter, as it has a much wider dispersion at 20 kHz than any other 1" dome I've seen measurements for. So the DIY project depends on buying what ever appears from KEF repair parts or used speakers on eBay.
For DIYers the LS50 wireless is the worth example ever
There are other KEF offers that can be improved by some tweaks like Q series cheap models Q100 and Q150
The LS50 wireless is easy to use but very high priced for the addition of an quite ordinary streamer, dac and poweramp to the passive version
Instead of the really boring to death Nubert stuff i would consider to take a look to this one, Raspberry Pi and plate amp for activation is then the next step
https://audiosciencereview.com/foru...chano23-open-source-diy-speaker-review.54066/
first P.S.:
since this is not the first very peculiar kind of teaser of the TO i think the best thing is to leave him alone with his few bricks short of a load - please do not take this comment too serious brother @Marveloudio ...
seconfd P.S.:
seriously - this is the wrong forum for this, ask Amirm of the ASR forum, if you bring him a pair of LS 50 wireless and a pair of the boring Nubert toys you may have luck
There are other KEF offers that can be improved by some tweaks like Q series cheap models Q100 and Q150
The LS50 wireless is easy to use but very high priced for the addition of an quite ordinary streamer, dac and poweramp to the passive version
Instead of the really boring to death Nubert stuff i would consider to take a look to this one, Raspberry Pi and plate amp for activation is then the next step
https://audiosciencereview.com/foru...chano23-open-source-diy-speaker-review.54066/
first P.S.:
since this is not the first very peculiar kind of teaser of the TO i think the best thing is to leave him alone with his few bricks short of a load - please do not take this comment too serious brother @Marveloudio ...
seconfd P.S.:
seriously - this is the wrong forum for this, ask Amirm of the ASR forum, if you bring him a pair of LS 50 wireless and a pair of the boring Nubert toys you may have luck
Last edited:
@juanitox was just kidding too in his first post i guess - be cool and do not take it all so serious 😎
your "how dare you" reaction made it serious
your "how dare you" reaction made it serious
Last edited:
Ah okay ... no problem ... only silver bullets can hurt me 🙂
The acoustic signature of a speaker radiating into a room is the sum of all reflections received by a microphone . Recording these bunch of reflections can give a good impression how different 2 speakers are sounding , subjectively one is better for the chosen music track . If you have a reference speaker any other will show how far it is from the reference , in that room and at that working position , plus regarding the mic position/orientation etc ...
now it's late here , tomorrow will be another day (hopefully) , bye!
The acoustic signature of a speaker radiating into a room is the sum of all reflections received by a microphone . Recording these bunch of reflections can give a good impression how different 2 speakers are sounding , subjectively one is better for the chosen music track . If you have a reference speaker any other will show how far it is from the reference , in that room and at that working position , plus regarding the mic position/orientation etc ...
now it's late here , tomorrow will be another day (hopefully) , bye!
This thread does not appear to be in the spirit of a diy forum. The Mods are closing it.
- Status
- Not open for further replies.