Line-Array

I have built a line_array with
this drivers 12x 3FE25 and 12x 4FE35 (faital pro)
I would like to add some tweeter at a modest price
Suggestion ?
Thanks
Michel
 

Attachments

  • 305467227_5283260678459629_6325360280629489509_n.jpg
    305467227_5283260678459629_6325360280629489509_n.jpg
    60.6 KB · Views: 249
I have built a line_array with
this drivers 12x 3FE25 and 12x 4FE35 (faital pro)
I would like to add some tweeter at a modest price
Suggestion ?
Thanks
Michel
Nice build.
Just thinking aloud : those small speakers reach quite high, rather than adding tweeters which should also be configured as a line array matched to the main one, etc, I would just EQ current speakers for flatness and extension, and call it a day.

A modest correction would do a lot.
 
Agreed….You‘re working outside of the classic Line Array principle here….. more a multi driver approach to a Line Source…..which IMO is the MUCH better option for home use where the listening position is about focus and sound stage instead of raw output.

I’d apply some power tapering to the 3FE portion…..break it down into 3 groups of four with the the central 4 producing the lions share. Add an inductor to the 4FE portion for a low pass filter around 350hz or so……OR power the system with multi channel power and DSP……6 channels and 3 DSP units
 
I have built a line_array with
this drivers 12x 3FE25 and 12x 4FE35 (faital pro)
I would like to add some tweeter at a modest price
Suggestion ?
Thanks
Michel

The tricky part is that there's two options and neither are ideal:

1) You can use a full length line of tweeters, but then you'll need about 48 tweeters and that's going to be expensive

2) If you use less than a full line of tweeters, the beamwidth will be a mess

I personally don't think the treble on the 3FE25s is particularly good. They're basically cheap efficient midranges, but the treble doesn't compare to a Tymphany TC9 or a Scanspeak 10F
 
I love the Faitals and think they are at the top of the line for 3" and 4" type of cone drivers. It is also a matter of taste, but I like the sound of it as a mid-high driver.

EQ is your tool, so work on that. Take care of the bump around 12K that masks the higher frequencies. Will never be top of the bill as a cone driver is not build to handle really high frequency in a nice way. If you smoothen them a bit around the 12 K and let it roll off, you will get a nice high-end. My trick is not to add what you are missing, but turn down what to loud to start with. With the 12K, they have a tendency to be a bit shouty, hence your ears tell you that you are missing the real high's, although they are there but mor in the background. Looking at the SPL of the driver mentioned by Patrick,

I use the 4FE32 for portable PA, and that's the best use for these, like the High frequency of the PA.

Adding a simple tweeter is barley noticeable, combined with the number of drivers you use likely overshooting the tweeter, apart from the input of Patrick. The fact that they are cheap does not really mean they are not good, I think they are, just work on getting the sound you are looking for, which is a matter of taste. Like a said, pull down what you don't like is the best option not spending loads of money, as this stack must have cost you already a serious amount of money. Maybe compare the frequency plot of the 3FE and the 4FE to begin with, I would personally never have used the 3FE, but just go for the 4FE, combined with a high efficiency tweeter in the Dappolite setting..
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Those tiny things are a joke. Not enough SPL up top to get decent levels with higher power levels after EQ is applied.

You'd be better off with the tried and true Tymphany TC9s. The power handling is sufficient to maintain enough top and bottom end when EQed and they sound absolutely fantastic overall, even without a sub.
 
  • Like
Reactions: GM