The aim is to unify the approach to testing new FET devices:
https://www.nist.gov/news-events/ne...gest-guidelines-assessing-emerging-transistor
https://www.nist.gov/news-events/ne...gest-guidelines-assessing-emerging-transistor
Unify standards behind a pay wallThe aim is to unify the approach to testing new FET devices:
https://www.nist.gov/news-events/ne...gest-guidelines-assessing-emerging-transistor
I share your frustration, but it will show up on SciHub soon.Unify standards behind a pay wall
It looks like it's about deep submicron transistors on future ICs, so I think it is not directly relevant for audio hobbyists anyway. Indirectly maybe, because it can have an effect on what exotic transistor types are used on future DSPs and FPGAs.
I've just got a general distaste for "standards" (particularly when their development is coming from public funds) being gatekept.It looks like it's about deep submicron transistors on future ICs, so I think it is not directly relevant for audio hobbyists anyway. Indirectly maybe, because it can have an effect on what exotic transistor types are used on future DSPs and FPGAs.
Agreed on applicability though.
It looks like it's about deep submicron transistors on future ICs, so I think it is not directly relevant for audio hobbyists anyway. Indirectly maybe, because it can have an effect on what exotic transistor types are used on future DSPs and FPGAs.
Agreed - I posted more for interest. Probably should have been under The Lounge now that I think about it 🤔
I've just got a general distaste for "standards" (particularly when their development is coming from public funds) being gatekept.
Agreed on applicability though.
I'm with you here - far too much is hidden behind unnecessarily expensive journals.