Carver Crimson 275 reviewed by ASR…
https://www.audiosciencereview.com/forum/index.php?threads/carver-crimson-275-review-tube-amp.29971/
usually I prefer the clan of the cave bear to stick with inaudible dac differentiation but roasting red Bob is entertaining
https://www.audiosciencereview.com/forum/index.php?threads/carver-crimson-275-review-tube-amp.29971/
usually I prefer the clan of the cave bear to stick with inaudible dac differentiation but roasting red Bob is entertaining
Mmm... a lot of people on ASR don't ascribe to one-number-explains-all, but I guess it's an easy label.
And boy oh boy is that thing a piece of junk.
And boy oh boy is that thing a piece of junk.
Last edited:
Not to mention the surreptitious use of a metal cover to enclose an output transformer that is woefully inadequate for the job:
https://www.audiosciencereview.com/forum/index.php?threads/carver-crimson-275-measurements.29271/
But completely avoiding the safety earth connection? That's indeed reckless endangerment. B+ per the schematic is sitting at a nice balmy 685V.
Best,
Anand.
https://www.audiosciencereview.com/forum/index.php?threads/carver-crimson-275-measurements.29271/
But completely avoiding the safety earth connection? That's indeed reckless endangerment. B+ per the schematic is sitting at a nice balmy 685V.
Best,
Anand.