• WARNING: Tube/Valve amplifiers use potentially LETHAL HIGH VOLTAGES.
    Building, troubleshooting and testing of these amplifiers should only be
    performed by someone who is thoroughly familiar with
    the safety precautions around high voltages.

Load Resistor for Single Stage Feedback Amplifier

I have a DAC with both SS and tube output stage. The tube output tube, 5670, was configured as a cathode follower as attached. Since my amplifier has low gain so I need more gain from the DAC. I plan to change the tube circuit to a single stage amplifier with feedback. Without feedback, the output impedance and distortion will be high. I also do not need a lot more gain.

I found detailed description on the design of such an amp from both Aikenamps and Vale Wizard site. I attached the example design from Aikenamps. My question is that the original design has an output capacitor with a resistor to ground. As the feedback amp contains a capacitor already, I don't think I would need that output capacitor. However, do I really need the Rl in the design? I assume Rl is the load impedance from the next stage.

The original design has a rather low resistor of 10K after the cathode follower. I can replace it with the a 100K resistor as in the example if necessary.

Finally, is there any downside with this kind of feedback single stage amplifier? Should I go without the feedback and deal with the high gain with a resistor divider? The THD will be higher. However, will the no feedback amplifier preserve the sound stage and details of the music?

Screenshot 2021-12-13 172514.gif
Screenshot 2021-12-13 172615.gif
 
I have a DAC with both SS and tube output stage. The tube output tube, 5670, was configured as a cathode follower as attached. Since my amplifier has low gain so I need more gain from the DAC. I plan to change the tube circuit to a single stage amplifier with feedback. Without feedback, the output impedance and distortion will be high. I also do not need a lot more gain.

I found detailed description on the design of such an amp from both Aikenamps and Vale Wizard site. I attached the example design from Aikenamps. My question is that the original design has an output capacitor with a resistor to ground. As the feedback amp contains a capacitor already, I don't think I would need that output capacitor. However, do I really need the Rl in the design? I assume Rl is the load impedance from the next stage.

The original design has a rather low resistor of 10K after the cathode follower. I can replace it with the a 100K resistor as in the example if necessary.

Finally, is there any downside with this kind of feedback single stage amplifier? Should I go without the feedback and deal with the high gain with a resistor divider? The THD will be higher. However, will the no feedback amplifier preserve the sound stage and details of the music?

View attachment 1004970 View attachment 1004971
The top schematic is a CF. The DC voltages are not correct for a 70V supply.
The bottom schema is an Anode Follower. The gain, input impedance & output impedance depends on the values of the FB resistors connected to the tube grid.
With a proper design the Anode Follower would work for you.
 
The top schematic is a CF. The DC voltages are not correct for a 70V supply.
The bottom schema is an Anode Follower. The gain, input impedance & output impedance depends on the values of the FB resistors connected to the tube grid.
With a proper design the Anode Follower would work for you.
Thanks for the reply. So do I need a load resistor (Rl) for the Anode Follower design? I found another design which had a Rl of 470K.
 
A Simple Anode Follower like this will give a gain of about 4X the CF,
The circuit is not optimized. More gain is possible if required.

Don't ask how the 12AT7 'sounds'. Ideally it would add nor take away from what the musicians intended.
If they intended 2nd harmonics to be added to their performance they would have done that while recording & mixing.
 

Attachments

  • 12AT7 Simple Anode Follower.JPG
    12AT7 Simple Anode Follower.JPG
    22.6 KB · Views: 92