• WARNING: Tube/Valve amplifiers use potentially LETHAL HIGH VOLTAGES.
    Building, troubleshooting and testing of these amplifiers should only be
    performed by someone who is thoroughly familiar with
    the safety precautions around high voltages.

EL84 - 6v6 SE UL Plan and Build

So hopefully this will be a design thread and a build thread. My plan is to develop a small amp with 4x6v6 SE UL outputs and a EL84 pentode input stage. So far I have ideas on what I want to do but no actual schematic.

Starting from the output stage. Will be using the Edcor CXSE25-1.25K output transformer with the 40% UL taps. The 6v6's will be biased at 250v, 16v bias and 37mA Ip and 4ma Is. In UL mode each 6v6 outputs about 3W. 4x 6v6 in parallel at the recommended 5K load will work just fine with that Edcor OPT.

Each 6V6 will have its own ~400 ohm cathode resistor, cathode cap, and also grid resistor and coupling cap from the EL84.

The EL84 will be run in pentode mode. No cathode bypass cap or run with LED / Diode bias. There may be enough gain here to run some "schade" feedback around the 6v6's too. The EL84 will have to be able to drive 100K.

That's as far as I have got so far. Not sure on Power Supply yet and not sure on specific values for the EL84.

The power supply will be using all Edcor iron.

I am thinking out aloud and will probably want gain of 32 from the input stage. 500mV input for full output.

Any comments and input will be greatly appreciated.
 
I have found that I can reduce output stage gain to about 3, using plate to grid feedback, using 6P6S (which is almost a 6v6)

So then with a 5k load, I need 30Vrms to drive the output to 100Vrms, and giving a good THD result of about 1.5%.
I am running them in triode, so the power comparison isnt valid-
FWIW I couldnt get them to better the THD in tetrode mode, at the same output, even if the power output is better.

This is not to say, that you couldnt do better !

Anecdotal stuff, maybe useful to you, maybe not.

I havent tried a pentode input stage, so I cant help there - my only thought is to wonder why the selection of EL84.

Wouldn't something smaller, work better? (Honest question, as I dont have an answer)
 
IMO, individual RC bias networks for each of the "finals" is insufficient. The matching between members of a quartet can be good, but it will be imperfect. Highly undesirable "current hogging" is quite possible. Combination bias, with individual trim pots., along with individual RC bias networks, will allow things to be set "just so".

Since the EL84 is being considered for "small signal" duty, I suggest the Russian 6Π15Π (6p15p) be considered too. Regulating g2 B+ with the 0A2 gas discharge tube disposes of its fragility and sockets correctly wired for the 6Π15Π accept EL84s without incident. "Rolling" opportunities are available.
 
Would an EF86, 6SJ7, or a C3m be a better option?

I was trying to keep to current manufactured tubes. The EL84 is very widespread and is not a bad driver tube (see the Legacy amps).

In your opinion a matched quad of 6v6's plus a say a 25 ohm unbypassed cathode resistor (plus the usual cathode resistor / cap combo) on each tube won't be enough?

Would it be easier to ditch the 6v6's and say jump to a KT88?