What is it in an amplifier that makes it better to control the base?
I'm building an active three way, and currently I use LM3886, but I what my speaker to do better. I have a clear idea on how I want to do the amplifier for both midrage and tweeter, but what about the subwoofer.
I havn't measured the impedanse of the subwoofer, but it's a 4 ohm driver (SB23MFCL45-4) with two passive radiators, so I dont expect it to be easy.
I have four pairs of MJ15003/4 and I intent to use them in the amplifier. I have a choise between 2*18V/6A or 2*25V/6A trafo, but I rarely play loud.
Questions: Do I go for the bigger trafo to get more headroom?
Do I aim for lots of open loop gain and thereby lots of feedback, to get very low output impendance?
Or do I aim for the ability to (in theory) drive 1 ohm, to be shure to have current enough?
Og do I aim for low bandwith in order to make the fase margine in the "safe" aren to make it more stabile?
Do I aim for higher idle current, in order to output stage more linear?
I'm building an active three way, and currently I use LM3886, but I what my speaker to do better. I have a clear idea on how I want to do the amplifier for both midrage and tweeter, but what about the subwoofer.
I havn't measured the impedanse of the subwoofer, but it's a 4 ohm driver (SB23MFCL45-4) with two passive radiators, so I dont expect it to be easy.
I have four pairs of MJ15003/4 and I intent to use them in the amplifier. I have a choise between 2*18V/6A or 2*25V/6A trafo, but I rarely play loud.
Questions: Do I go for the bigger trafo to get more headroom?
Do I aim for lots of open loop gain and thereby lots of feedback, to get very low output impendance?
Or do I aim for the ability to (in theory) drive 1 ohm, to be shure to have current enough?
Og do I aim for low bandwith in order to make the fase margine in the "safe" aren to make it more stabile?
Do I aim for higher idle current, in order to output stage more linear?
Chip amplifiers 3886 do not provide high current (see datasheet).
The current can be increased by additional transistors (class B). It will take a pair or more MJ15003/4.
You can use a Class B or D amplifier for the subwoofer.
The current can be increased by additional transistors (class B). It will take a pair or more MJ15003/4.
You can use a Class B or D amplifier for the subwoofer.
For good and "fast" bass you need amp with high DF....the best bass I've heard comes from the Pass AB100 amp. Of course, everyone likes their own "bass"..and it also depends on the design of the subwoofer box etc..
I know Luxman, but open loop is zero feedback and lots of feedback is oposite from zero feedback.
The subwoofer amplifier may be low quiescent current (class B or AB).
For high power, class D is recommended.
For high power, class D is recommended.
"Do I aim for lots of open loop gain and thereby lots of feedback"
That's contradictory.
Not really. It's just idiosyncratic terminology. Douglas Self's book, and many other sources in the field of audio amplifier design, often uses the expression "lots of feedback" to mean "lots of excess gain". The difference between open loop gain and closed loop gain (what EE textbooks would call "excess gain") is called "the amount of feedback" in audio amplifier discussions. When the excess gain is large, i.e., when open loop gain is much greater than closed loop gain, there is "lots of feedback".
For example an uA741 opamp has an open loop gain of about 77dB at 100 Hz. If it's used to make an amplifier with a closed loop gain of 20dB (i.e. 10x), then "the amount of feedback" at 100 Hz is said to be 57 dB. Figure below.
I recommend performing a mental substitution when you hear or read the phrase "lots of feedback". Replace it by "lots of excess gain, available to provide negative feedback"
_
Attachments
Thanks Mark Johnson, that terminology confused me.
Low feedback means more gain, and vice versa.
"lots of open loop gain and thereby lots of feedback" to me sounds like: low feedback and lots of feedback, in the same circuit 🙂
Low feedback means more gain, and vice versa.
"lots of open loop gain and thereby lots of feedback" to me sounds like: low feedback and lots of feedback, in the same circuit 🙂
Anyway, low feedback amplifiers are considered to sound better, but lots of feedback amps have better damping factor and much lower distortion.
Subwoofer distortion ranges from a few percent to tens of percent.
The lower the frequency, the greater the distortion.
The lower the frequency, the greater the distortion.
...the subwoofer, but it's a 4 ohm driver (SB23MFCL45-4) with two passive radiators -
Passive radiators make the subwoofer smaller. Good for the movie. Friendly for easy placement. But they have worse dynamics than a closed box. Less (don't)musical.
Passive radiators make the subwoofer smaller. Good for the movie. Friendly for easy placement. But they have worse dynamics than a closed box. Less (don't)musical.
Not really. It's just idiosyncratic terminology. Douglas Self's book, and many other sources in the field of audio amplifier design, often uses the expression "lots of feedback" to mean "lots of excess gain". The difference between open loop gain and closed loop gain (what EE textbooks would call "excess gain") is called "the amount of feedback" in audio amplifier discussions. When the excess gain is large, i.e., when open loop gain is much greater than closed loop gain, there is "lots of feedback".
For example an uA741 opamp has an open loop gain of about 77dB at 100 Hz. If it's used to make an amplifier with a closed loop gain of 20dB (i.e. 10x), then "the amount of feedback" at 100 Hz is said to be 57 dB. Figure below.
I recommend performing a mental substitution when you hear or read the phrase "lots of feedback". Replace it by "lots of excess gain, available to provide negative feedback"
_
Exactly.
If one has an amplifier with a high amount of open loop gain, when the loop is closed, you end up with more available feedback you can apply without instability.
For tight controlled bass, if one were to pursue such a thing, you'd want a low damping factor this comes with lots of feedback. Beyond this you want the amplifier to be able to swing enough volts for your requirements and to be able to provide the required amount of current at the given output swing.
Even if you don't listen at high volumes the 2*25V transformer is the logical choice.
25V transformer = rails of 34V minus a couple of diode drops. Factor in some rail sag and output stage loss and you'll lose around 5V on the available output swing, perhaps a bit more so we're looking at 29V rails. Roughly 100 watts into a 4 ohm load.
One pair of output transistors would do this an actively driven subwoofer is not a difficult load to drive. Simulating a little the SB will only dip down to a hair under 4 ohms at the tuning frequency. Here the phase angle is close to zero, so easy to drive. I'm using a 20 litre box tuned to 30Hz. The worst you're looking at is around a 5-6 ohm load at a phase angle of 30-40 degrees. This is not a terribly hard load to drive.
To get the most out of the driver you would need more than 100 watts. A peak power of 300 watts would make more sense with an rms output of 200.
Then again you don't listen very loud so this is up to you.
To make the most of the hardware you've got available you could build a bridged amplifier. This would simply provide you with the voltage swing for transients should you ever need it. Two pairs of output transistors per side. If the voltage rails held steady with 34V you'd be looking at 400 watts into a 2 ohm load. This pushes the output transistors a tad too hard for my liking when you derate for a decent temperature rise. Luckily I don't think that would ever be a problem. The transformer you've got is only rated for 6A, the voltage rails will fall significantly as you approach higher output powers and will self limit the continuous output power as a result. You'll get short bursts of higher power but that's about it.
Given you don't want loud you could go the sensible route.
A standard, non bridged, power amplifier, use the 25V transformer. For increased reliability use two pairs of output transistors per side, and keep the Re resistor values as low as you feel comfortable going. Go for a complementary feedback amplifier to maximise efficiency and only use single pole compensation. The amplifier is only going to be used for low frequencies so two pole, or any other elaborate compensation techniques won't give you any more feedback where you need it.
This will leave you with two pairs of output transistors left over, giving you spares in case of an accident.
Place the amplifier close to the subwoofer to keep the cable run, from the sub to the driver, as short as possible.
Spec sheet: SB23MFCL45-4
Optimized for smaller enclosures
Box recommendations:
Sealed box of 0.4 to 0.5 cubic feet for an F3 of 65Hz. You would need to use a bass boost or DSP to push the driver into lower frequencies. The F6 is 45Hz and F10 is 35Hz.
Vented box of 0.8 to 1.0 cubic feet with a 2" port by 8" long for an F3 of 35 to 32Hz.
Rated power handling 150 W.
SB Acoustics SB23MFCL45-4, 8" Sub Woofer
Optimized for smaller enclosures
Box recommendations:
Sealed box of 0.4 to 0.5 cubic feet for an F3 of 65Hz. You would need to use a bass boost or DSP to push the driver into lower frequencies. The F6 is 45Hz and F10 is 35Hz.
Vented box of 0.8 to 1.0 cubic feet with a 2" port by 8" long for an F3 of 35 to 32Hz.
Rated power handling 150 W.
SB Acoustics SB23MFCL45-4, 8" Sub Woofer
Just keep in mind- for bridged amp DF will be dividided by 2...and thd also will be increased...
Very high damping factor doesn't make much sense. Damping is limited by speaker's own impedance, so DF of 1,000 has practically same damping as DF of 10.
Not at all."Do I aim for lots of open loop gain and thereby lots of feedback"
That's contradictory.
High **open loop* gain means you will apply more NFB to reach the final amp gain.
Suppose final amp gain (as used, with NFB) is 20X.
You have 2 circuits, one has 100X open loop gain, the other 500X
When tamed down to 20X, the higher open loop gain one will be using 5X higher NFB than the other.
As in 14 dB more 😱
- Home
- Amplifiers
- Solid State
- What to aim for in an amplifier designed for controlled bass