Greetings, ive been planning a Class D subwoofer amp using modules as its cheaper then buying say a Dayton Audio plate of equal power.
My original plan was to use a stereo TPA3255 board, and just use one channel making it possible to be a stereo subwoofer amp with a PSU upgrade. But today i found THIS IRS2092, IRFB4227 module for cheaper, but needs split power and not a cheap MW switch mode. AS-4440?
Does anyone have experience with those IRS boards? for 4 Ohm subwoofer use would i get any more power using it instead of a TPA3255? i believe the TPA3255 at 4Ohm 1% 51V gives 250Wx2.
My original plan was to use a stereo TPA3255 board, and just use one channel making it possible to be a stereo subwoofer amp with a PSU upgrade. But today i found THIS IRS2092, IRFB4227 module for cheaper, but needs split power and not a cheap MW switch mode. AS-4440?
Does anyone have experience with those IRS boards? for 4 Ohm subwoofer use would i get any more power using it instead of a TPA3255? i believe the TPA3255 at 4Ohm 1% 51V gives 250Wx2.
I compared TPA3255 vs IRS2092
TPA3255 win.
Thats vague, in which ways does it win?
Does anyone have experience with those IRS boards? for 4 Ohm subwoofer use would i get any more power using it instead of a TPA3255? i believe the TPA3255 at 4Ohm 1% 51V gives 250Wx2.
Hi, as shown below, I own a dual mono IRS2092 Board fully discret components and I also own many TPA32XX boards.
The good question should be :
What about one high end TPA32XX board vs one high end IRS2092 one.
This IRS2092 is particulary great and a found the soundstage being very very good and absolutely dead silence between tracks. I agree with DrMordor, I think anyway that the high end TPA32XX (360 customs for instance) will be better than the top end IRS2092.
But, a good IRS2092 sounds better than a bad TPA32XX. I tested some IRS2092 modules, this is one is my favorite (Nichicon and Epcos caps, speakers protection etc)
But don't get me wrong, no need to spend so much for a great TPA32XX (see the famous Aiyima TPA3251)


Last edited:
The IRS2092 is potentially much better for high power amplifiers.
Adding extra gate driver chips and more powerful mosfets will give a very powerful amp.
If you just want a low power system then the TPA is the way to go.
Adding extra gate driver chips and more powerful mosfets will give a very powerful amp.
If you just want a low power system then the TPA is the way to go.
If you look for something up to 100W/8 Ohms the TPA3255 is the way to go. It is rock solid and can easily be powered by batteries. Being a great fan of these I would not recommend them for bigger power ratings. Cooling power losses of 30W and above from this tiny chip? How will you guarantee 100% thermal contact between chip and heat sink? This is fishy imho and the IRS-amps come in. These work fine as well, can be adequately cooled and are also rock solid. But they require dual-rail power-supply and standby power consumption is mediocre at least - not a candidate for battery powered systems.
Good info. But from the 2 i linked in the start, for subwoofer use the IRS would be better? What kind of power can i expect from it using +/- 56V? even 2 of the IRS boards would be cheaper then a single stereo TPA3255
Last edited:
I Seen your amp in the class D pics fourm. What case is that and whats your power supply?Hi, as shown below, I own a dual mono IRS2092 Board fully discret components and I also own many TPA32XX boards.
The good question should be :
What about one high end TPA32XX board vs one high end IRS2092 one.
This IRS2092 is particulary great and a found the soundstage being very very good and absolutely dead silence between tracks. I agree with DrMordor, I think anyway that the high end TPA32XX (360 customs for instance) will be better than the top end IRS2092.
But, a good IRS2092 sounds better than a bad TPA32XX. I tested some IRS2092 modules, this is one is my favorite (Nichicon and Epcos caps, speakers protection etc)
But don't get me wrong, no need to spend so much for a great TPA32XX (see the famous Aiyima TPA3251)
![]()
![]()
I Seen your amp in the class D pics fourm. What case is that and whats your power supply?
This is an ABS enclosure that I bought @TME store in Poland.
I particulary like it because it is big enough for any DIY project and finally well designed. The PSU is a 800W LLC SMPS
Here an example with a TPA3255 Zero Zone board.

Good info. But from the 2 i linked in the start, for subwoofer use the IRS would be better? What kind of power can i expect from it using +/- 56V? even 2 of the IRS boards would be cheaper then a single stereo TPA3255
I guess you need a 2.1 system ? Or only subwoofer use ?
I guess you need a 2.1 system ? Or only subwoofer use ?
Its just for subwoofer. I Have a generic 80's class ABer for the fullrangers.
I have the two amplifiers TPA325x and IRS2092. The IRS2092 is of good quality and fed by a linear. For the bass I find the IRS2092 has a much better power handling. The TPA325X is more musical. On my bi-amplified system, I use an IRS2092 for low frequencies, it's the best
I have the two amplifiers TPA325x and IRS2092. The IRS2092 is of good quality and fed by a linear. For the bass I find the IRS2092 has a much better power handling. The TPA325X is more musical. On my bi-amplified system, I use an IRS2092 for low frequencies, it's the best
TPA325x with PFFB better than IRS2092
TPA325x with PFFB better than IRS2092
I agree ) This is why I spoke about high quality TPA32XX previously. PFFB is enabled on top end TPA32XX boards. (XRK Audio, TI EVM, 360 Customs)
When you say PFFB, same as PBTL ??
No))))) PFFB this is Post Filter FeedBack
PBTL this is Parallel Bridge Tied Load😉
Okay so it's not the same!!
Checkout :
http://www.ti.com/lit/an/slaa788a/slaa788a.pdf?ts=1590216724964
- Home
- Amplifiers
- Class D
- IRS2092 Modules VS TPA3255