New fullrange drivers - does anyone know these?

Of course ,those 14 dB dips are big "chips" to eat . And the prolonged cone movement
at where frequency is at its minimum level ,around 5 KHz ,suggests a correction circuit ,either.
Mhhh. Could it be there an acoustical way to null those differences ? Two reverse phased drivers in gas filled bipole ? 🙂
 
The AX-08's are pretty delayed, Europe Audio said they are expecting to ship them next Wednesday. I will post pictures when I get them, and check the clearance around the whizzer also. The AXT-08 midwoofers have black rubbery surround on the magnets that has small pattern (identical to the comparison post above), not a big patter like in the picture you posted. Luckily I will receive the Beyma 12GA50's next week, they are also much anticipated:cheers:!
 
Last edited:
Traditional way to tame resonances are notch filters. Cone treatment etc. modifications are also possible. This (controlling resonances) will also make the waterfall clearer. There are always some haze in the waterfall plot of full rangers. If one wants real fullranger with very flat FR and very damped and fast decay (that no dynamic driver can match), the ESL panel is the way to go. I have both.

I also presume the Gradients might have some shout at the upper midrange without any eq or cone treatment. With proper eq they might sound more neutral. But deducing the sound quality from measurements = pretty much impossible.

Ps. You can also check the waterfall plots of the revered Supravox drivers, there are measurements for each driver: http://www.supravox.fr/anglais/les_hp.htm
 
Last edited:
Stuck in the full range paradigm?

Cone treatment? Yeah, use cones smaller than wavelengths being reproduced.

Cone modification? This is what manufactures do on a regular basis.

Peaks seen in waterfalls have high narrow bandwidth/high Q. Doing this passively is equivalent to doing steep crossover filters passively.

Haze in waterfall plots? What kind of term is this?

Shout is most used by the full ranger crowd. Indeed, beaming and lobe behavior of drivers used full range, in conjunction with harmonic distortion and attendant IMD make these drivers scream "don't do it this way".

Deducing sound quality from measurements is much more reliable, and practicable way for assessing sound quality.

Blind rankings of speakers for quality time after time reveal sharp tendency for most preferred speakers being speakers that measure with the flattest response, and that maintain this over widest radiation pattern.

supravox is completely stuck in legacy land. Try perhaps Mark Audio for outfit that is truly trying to extend driver range.

You have ESL panel, yet it apparently doesn't satisfy you. In real rooms sound pressure interacts with membrane, leading to very rough consistency to directional pattern.

Dream of dreams, a full range driver that does it all. Dream on.

Best approach is making multiple drivers act as one. With appropriate driver selection, arrangement, and crossover.