GRS 8FR-8 Full Range Low Budget Project

Have here a nice and cheap pair of GRS 8FR-8 drivers and like to put them in a simple cabinet.

Data sheet GRS 8FR-8:

Resonant frequency fS 39 Hz
Electrical Q QES 0.46
Mechanical Q QMS 2.94
Total Q factor QTS 0.40
Suspension equivalent air volume VAS 64 litres
DC resistance RE 7.02 Ω
Voice coil inductance LE 1.28 mH
Maximum linear excursion Xmax ± 3 mm
Efficiency η₀ 0.81 %
Efficiency bandwidth product EBP 84
Overall diameter 203.2 mm
Baffle hole diameter 184.1 mm
Mounting depth 98.4 mm
Diaphragm material Paper
Voice coil diameter 38.1 mm
Magnet Ferrite


Proposal:
 

Attachments

  • GRS 8FR8 full range BR cabinet_page-0001.jpg
    GRS 8FR8 full range BR cabinet_page-0001.jpg
    285.8 KB · Views: 715
  • Opstelling GRS 8FR8-1.jpg
    Opstelling GRS 8FR8-1.jpg
    294 KB · Views: 480
  • Opstelling GRS 8FR8-2.jpg
    Opstelling GRS 8FR8-2.jpg
    205.1 KB · Views: 522
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Again some little modifications.
Added some supports for the looks :love: .
 

Attachments

  • Opstelling GRS 8FR8-3.jpg
    Opstelling GRS 8FR8-3.jpg
    363.5 KB · Views: 153
  • Opstelling GRS 8FR8-2.jpg
    Opstelling GRS 8FR8-2.jpg
    205.2 KB · Views: 92
  • Opstelling GRS 8FR8-1.jpg
    Opstelling GRS 8FR8-1.jpg
    300.8 KB · Views: 155
  • GRS 8FR8 full range BR cabinet_page-0001 (1).jpg
    GRS 8FR8 full range BR cabinet_page-0001 (1).jpg
    380.1 KB · Views: 152
frugal-phile™
Joined 2001
Paid Member
Guidline 1: braces should be placed such that the subpanels created by the brace should have an aspect ratio larger than the panelbeing braced.

This is clearly not the case in your design, where the aspect ratios are all less. You want to push resonances up in frequency where they will be less likely to get excited.

Tappan-braces.gif


A reflex box is assummed to be “close" to a cube. As one dimension grows a quarter-wave resonance starts across the longest dimension. Your box is tall enuff vrs width/depth that it will be an ML-TL. The end-loaded driver and vent will maximize the quarter-wave effect.

dave
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
frugal-phile™
Joined 2001
Paid Member
The braces should run vertically. I also take the opportunity to brace the driver/baffle against teh back of the box as well as top and bottom. Braces runnign parallel to the baffle should truncate such that they are not directly behind the driver.

And if you want to model the box you need to use a proper modeler that will handle quarter-wave designs.

dave
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
frugal-phile™
Joined 2001
Paid Member
What? That has little to do with it. And if you are using quality plywood (recommended) each ply has the grain running 90° to the ones next to it.

Grain implies solid wood, something i do not recommend if you do not know what you are doing. Still has little impact on the most effective bracing.

dave
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Take a look at some of the enclosure designs posted in the libraries below that Dave and Scott Lindgren have accumulated over the past couple of decades, many of which I’ve built myself. They should give you a better visualization of the bracing topology he’s suggesting.
http://frugal-phile.com/
http://www.wodendesign.com/Free.html

edit, actually it just occurred to me that many of Scott’s drawings lack the specific bracing details, but IIRC make reference to including such.
 
Boy was i wrong.
'Birds of a feather'! My mom made it plain to me and all concerned that no son of hers would ever be a secretary! So continued along a 'jack o'trades, master of none' career only to wind up in an engineering position that required copious written docs of various types to be typed by the secretarial pool and later do it all myself on a computer system, though with all that came before being eventually uploaded, so all I had to do was 'tailor' it to the current project.
 
Friends. Please dont tell me how to brace this low budget speaker box 😃l have made a lot in the past.

For this speaker its more than enough 👍.
 

Attachments

  • 2.jpg
    2.jpg
    172.3 KB · Views: 173
  • 6.JPG
    6.JPG
    129.6 KB · Views: 148
  • 14.jpg
    14.jpg
    402.7 KB · Views: 132
  • 7.jpg
    7.jpg
    277.2 KB · Views: 132
  • 6 (1).jpg
    6 (1).jpg
    283.3 KB · Views: 120
  • 3.PNG
    3.PNG
    191.6 KB · Views: 131
  • 11.jpg
    11.jpg
    241.9 KB · Views: 119
  • 14 (1).jpg
    14 (1).jpg
    552.3 KB · Views: 135
  • 33.png
    33.png
    1.1 MB · Views: 124
  • 2.gif
    2.gif
    209.3 KB · Views: 126
  • 3.jpg
    3.jpg
    237.5 KB · Views: 109
  • 4.PNG
    4.PNG
    186.8 KB · Views: 102
  • 2.PNG
    2.PNG
    234.2 KB · Views: 144