Isolation/safety transformer built (professional)

Just for educational purposes (and because of the excellent results of this one) a picture of a custom built Noratel Imed medical isolation transformer.

This one has something non standard. It comes with 2 primary 115V windings (for 230V in series) and 3 separate secondary windings 2 x 115V/230V so 3 galvanic separated groups. The device of course has electronic slow start as it is 1000VA (no power saving techniques found for the bypass relay). It also has a PE leakage test circuit with test and reset button. So in effect this device functions more or less like 3 transformers in 1 casing. Also nice is the built in mains filter which is lacking in other models of this brand.

Everything is double pole so 2 mains fuses and a double pole mains switch. It was meant to be used with endoscopes.

The rule of thumb with audiophiles seems to be the higher the voltages the smaller the chance of finding PE in the installations and/or DIY devices. Please see the meticulous wiring of PE.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_3122.jpg
    IMG_3122.jpg
    472.8 KB · Views: 301
Last edited:
Correct, it also has the external hardsilver PE connectors as usual with medical equipment (upper left corner).

All in all an excellent piece of equipment. I like the multiple secondary 230V windings but I suppose having such a transformer wound is not affordable. A 500 VA version combined with group distribution would be nice for audio. This one is quite large. I have smaller ones but these lack a front mains switch, mains filter and the multiple windings. The 2 kVA version is unusable for audio as it hums severely and also lacks all the mentioned features. Weighs a ton too 🙂
 
Last edited:
It is single phase input as can be seen. It has 3 separate output windings which is probably its added value for audio. It is 1000 VA so little chance it will sag with the 2 x 3W amp + Elac Discovery I am using with it 🙂

As these are in use with very expensive power demanding medical stuff without any issue I trust the quality. They feed the various sections of endoscope systems with high res video systems etc.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_3128.jpg
    IMG_3128.jpg
    376.4 KB · Views: 113
Last edited:
You could ask but do so before the camera goes where the sun doesn't shine. BTW using a mains isolation transformer is one of the best upgrades in audio systems. In my experience they offer immediate improvement certainly when a good mains filter is also used. Probably food for endless debate but every time I take one out of my setup I regret it directly.

A middle way is to use a small one for only the sources. Like an IMEDe150 (just below 190 Euro). Point to use a medical version is because of the tight specifications and very low leakage.

* Example of one of the benefits/design features: one can touch the output L with one hand and PE with the other hand without dangerous consequences. Don't do this of course. For audio the lower noise is a benefit.
 
Last edited:
Yes it looks odd at first but apparently no risk of wires/cables coming loose and making things dangerous or malfunctioning is accepted.

During production/testing of high power DC systems normal corrugated cardboard is also still temporarily used as isolator despite all modern plastic sheet etc.
 
Last edited:
That looks expensive, but nice if you can find one.

I have had one at work under my desk for about ten years now, 1kva, is probably 40-50 years old, found it in a scrap bin. I have a 500va one there also, but it has a slight hum, was probably abused.

I was pleasantly surprised at the improvement it made with my headphone rig.

The one at home is made from two identical 800va transformers in a case. I put a CLCLC line filter between them.
 
Seen it before also with plain 230V/xV transformer followed by an identical xV/230V transformer used "in reverse" which broadens the choice as long as they are identical. Will it bring any benefit compared to extremely low leakage medical gear? I mean, is the means not worse than the issue? Twice the losses too.

BTW I recently got a schematic of a device built/sold commercially where the secondary middle point was coupled to the N of the primary winding...
 
Last edited:
I recall that the one at work sounded better with the mains filter after the isolation transformer.
Not sure if the is any electrical/perceived audio benefit to having the filter between the two, but packaging-wise, it worked well. Actually have another line filter after the transformer/filter/transformer setup…
 
One would think (experiences with medical transformers also point that way) that having garbage not entering, so filtering before the transformer, is most effective.

Now devices with those wonderful SMPS tend to feedback garbage so these are also equipped with a mains filter. Well, there things start to become complicated when an isolation transformer with built in mains filter is feeding such devices.
 
Well it’s kind of buried currently, but it is just two Hafler DH500 transformers bolted to an old chassis with the filter parts in between them on the 69v secondaries, with a 2 gang outlet. The other filter is built inside a steel terminal strip.