John, I think you have to think a bit longer about my #798. It is not about position but about acceleration. In the case of a plucked string, nothing accelerates at a faster rate than when the string is just vibrating steady state. In case of a random jump into a signal, there is this rapid accelation=impulse. Plucking a string is the one excpetion where you don't get this impulse.
Last edited:
Well John, I understand what vac is saying, I don't understand what you are saying, so your message isn't getting through, sorry 🙂
However, I will NEVER crack open my thermodynamics book. I stil get nightmares..
Jn
I haven't yet, but if I ever get time I want another go to defeat it. I find one of the forms of the second law a beautiful way of saying 'you lose' 🙂
Record how? A low BW mic, mic an amp, direct in?
If you use a low BW mic, then of course.
If you think about it in terms of motion, the string has to violate Nyquist at start. That was why I asked if a pickup would filter. Electric, not acoustic.
Jn
Of course the whole sytem needs enough BW. The string motion needs to accelerate frome zero, hows that automaticaly violate Nyquist? If your talking electric guitar, think about the 1 fullrange driver in most guit amps, how much BW will that have?
I believe leading edge is important to localization. Image, soundstage..Well, if the leading edge has frequency components that is beyond our ability to hear - then they are .... not audible and there is no loss losing them in an anti-aliasing filter ;-D
There are a lot of audio events around us daily that has content that we don't hear. So also a guitar - but we don't mind, as we don't know.
//
Jn
Yes but, that's not due to the frequency components as suchI believe leading edge is important to localization. Image, soundstage..
Jn
electric guitars are a mono source that is pan potted, image and soundstage are mixing desk constructs. Just checking and seems that classical guitar is generally recorded with a single mic as well.
A couple of throw away comments seem to have caused you some concern Jakob. FWIW I'm with Scott. It's on record here that John does keep repeating the same old stories. Why aren't we talking about great recordings being made NOW. Surely it can't be that there is nothing?
On the microphone side Demian has noted that Keith Johnson of Reference recordings has 50 year old microphones some of which can reach 30khz.
As Demian noted and I forgot DPA is essentially the B&K for recording mics. One of their most popular is the DPA 4006 with a good balance of noise and FR, 20 - 20k +-2dB, 14dBA noise. This is about what you get with an ~1/2" diaphragm. I would note this is an electret capsule so no external bias and far more user friendly.
B&K capsules are all metal and 200V bias for a reason, they can be calibrated and stable to NIST traceable standards as instruments, you pay for that.
Think of a pendulum. Hold it at it's maximum excursion and let go. Now, one cycle later, it is exactly where it was when you let go, and it is also at the same velocity the instant you let go, zero. If you recorded the position, velocity, and acceleration from let go, it is the exact same as one cycle later, you can't tell the difference. Same with a string.Of course the whole sytem needs enough BW. The string motion needs to accelerate frome zero, hows that automaticaly violate Nyquist? If your talking electric guitar, think about the 1 fullrange driver in most guit amps, how much BW will that have?
And yes, a single driver BW is mud. Hence my question regarding how it is recorded. Mic the amp, I tend to doubt mic BW is important.
Jn
Not knowing much about plucked strings i googled it. I know a bit more, but it seems that exact result of a plucked string is varied.
This from a 2nd yr uni course (hamilton.edu):
And a couple interesting graphs (E4 is 330 Hz):
Where the sting is plucked makes a difference:
A derivation of the plucked string (looks like from the typewriter days): https://newt.phys.unsw.edu.au/music/people/publications/Fletcher1976d.pdf
And another with some animated gifs: The Vibration of a Fixed-Fixed String
dave
This from a 2nd yr uni course (hamilton.edu):
Plucked Strings
Normal modes of a string form an Harmonic Series.
String of length L has normal modes of wavelength λn = 2L/n where n is an integer
and frequencies where T is the string tension, L is the length of the string, and μ is the mass/length
When a string is plucked a pair of kinks travel along the string backwards and forwards at the wave speed.
The sharpness of the kinks depends on the size and hardness of the plucking material
Sharper kinks involve the highest frequency modes
Softer kinks will lack those highest modes and so have a less bright sound.
Plucking Strings
The plucking point affects the tone color of the sound.
The Modes with anti-nodes near the plucking point are emphasized.
The nearer the plucking point is to the anti-node the more the mode is emphasized.
Modes with nodes at the plucking point are missing from the spectrum.
Plucking at the mid-point gives a hollow, lute-like sound that is missing the even harmonics.
Plucking closer and closer to the bridge gives brighter and harsher sounds
We can suppress lower modes by damping the string to produce “harmonics”.
And a couple interesting graphs (E4 is 330 Hz):
Spectrum of plucked string sound of a classical acoustic guitar, open string E 4 . Spectrum zoomed to a single partial is shown in the subplot.
![]()
Where the sting is plucked makes a difference:
Spectrum of string plucked one-fifth of the distance from one end [10].
![]()
A derivation of the plucked string (looks like from the typewriter days): https://newt.phys.unsw.edu.au/music/people/publications/Fletcher1976d.pdf
And another with some animated gifs: The Vibration of a Fixed-Fixed String
dave
If the abrupt start is filtered, the leading edge will suffer.Yes but, that's not due to the frequency components as such
If the leading edge is used for localization, image suffers.
Jn
The acceleration is maximum at let go, and when the string is at the limits of it's travel. It is at maximum velocity when it is exactly in the center of travel.John, I think you have to think a bit longer about my #798. It is not about position but about acceleration. In the case of a plucked string, nothing accelerates at a faster rate than when the string is just vibrating steady state. In case of a random jump into a signal, there is this rapid accelation=impulse. Plucking a string is the one excpetion where you don't get this impulse.
Ps. Planet 10, interesting stuff. I would assume that spectra is integrated spectra. I assume that as time goes on, the spectra drops towards the fundamental, all the other lines decay quickly.
Jn
Last edited:
But I did note an award winning hires blues recording...
What was it Bill?
I looked through my music library and I can’t tell what the provenance of the hi-res really is. I could list a bunch of ones I think sound good but it’s fairly useless until you actually buy a download with documented roots.
a lot of the tracks I find exceptionally well recorded are 16/44.1 😱
Position? Doesn't a pickup see velocity?
Jn
Integrate and you’ll get position.
Integrate and you’ll get position.
Agreed, but what would integrate? I'm thinking the pickup is a velocity measuring device, no?
Jn
Break The Chain | Doug MacLeod | Reference RecordingsWhat was it Bill?
Exactly Like This | Doug MacLeod | Reference Recordings
back in the early 80s when people were exploring what digital could do there were a lot of really high quality recordings done, many on soundstream. Sadly bar the Telarc releases a lot of them were not great music, but sure a few people still have a 'flim and the BB's' CD they bought at a hifi show and keep as a guilty pleasure or test disc. Done properly 16/44.1 can be superb. As George pointed out as soon as you start exploring the DR capabilities of digital things become almost unlisteable in the home environment, unless you are Ed in his sealed bunker.a lot of the tracks I find exceptionally well recorded are 16/44.1 😱
Yes, the leading edge will not be as abrupt, but how abrupt does is have to be?If the abrupt start is filtered, the leading edge will suffer.
If the leading edge is used for localization, image suffers.
Re, localisation, do you mean ITD?
Just popped up on one of my news-feeds. On recording mics. I assume 4 more parts before.
Understand Recording #5 Microphones | DSD-Guide.com
dave
Understand Recording #5 Microphones | DSD-Guide.com
dave
You said it...not me.😀Yes, the leading edge will not be as abrupt, but how abrupt does is have to be?
Re, localisation, do you mean ITD?
And I have no idea how leading edge filtering affects how we localize. I do know 5 uSec ITD, but that doesn't mean 5 uSec edge change.
So the answer is a big fat...I dunno..
Jn
- Home
- Member Areas
- The Lounge
- The Black Hole......