John Curl's Blowtorch preamplifier part III

Status
Not open for further replies.
I’m not sure i’ll be using correct terminology so bear with me!

when the zobel network is used between the xo and tweeter does it change the speaker impedance the HP ‘sees’ as in measured tweeter impedance is 3.9ohm and when the 6r/0.47uf zobel was in place is the HP circuit now calculated @ 6ohm?
I was getting some screwy fr with the 6r and changed it to 4r (closest I had to 3.9)and things are much happier.......so basically should the zobel match measured driver impedance?

And on topic i’m thinking joes setup will only work as a system designed to be played together and never seperated? Much like I tune my stuff to the lp?
 
I’m not sure i’ll be using correct terminology so bear with me!
when the zobel network is used between the xo and tweeter does it change the speaker impedance the HP ‘sees’ as in measured tweeter impedance is 3.9ohm and when the 6r/0.47uf zobel was in place is the HP circuit now calculated @ 6ohm?
The HPF is seeing a rising impedance load due to tweeter VC inductance.....the zobel network flattens the tweeter apparent load to 3.9R regardless of frequency.
I was getting some screwy fr with the 6r and changed it to 4r (closest I had to 3.9)and things are much happier.......so basically should the zobel match measured driver impedance?
Yes,the zobel network resistor should match the DC resistance of the driver (tweeter).
And on topic i’m thinking joes setup will only work as a system designed to be played together and never seperated? Much like I tune my stuff to the lp?
The aim of Joe's setup is that the speaker does not change according to amp/cable resistance, on the flipside changes in amp freq response and cable reactance will become more audible as you have discovered.
 
The aim of Joe's setup is that the speaker does not change according to amp/cable resistance, on the flipside changes in amp freq response and cable reactance will become more audible as you have discovered.

Thanks Dan, I suppose my impedance matching must be fairly close for a zobel not to work in front of the xo ?

For all this to happen on the fly in joes amp it’s gonna need some serious dsp because this doesn’t sound like it’s possible any other way?
 
For example, with current drive (which I am not promoting) there is no reactive current, no matter how reactive you might consider the load. Think about it.
Well, the current isn't reactive because in a current drive amp the current is the controlled quantity (by feedback), but the voltage is, determined by the reactive load. The output stage sees the same reactive load conditions with the same current to voltage relationships (relevant for crossover-distortion and thermal behaviour, operating points etc) as it does under voltage drive -- assumed that both are eq'd to the same SPL transfer target. We just switch the controlled quantity. To first order and beyond the output is identical as long as we stay inside the driver's dominantly linear range, and load conditions for the amp also don't change.
 
It seems being called a charlatan is not aggressive... pull the other leg.

What happens if the current suddenly goes to zero - say you open a switch between the amp and the speaker?

You tell me. It seems obvious to me, so I am not sure what you are getting at? I am assuming the current here is from a current source, right?

Are you saying that there is something stored? Please be more precise.
 
I knew what it was but never experimented with it till now......I think I’ve got the r correct but need a little less c , I thinks it’s limiting my ‘air’ a touch.....gonna order up a 0.33uf and try that instead of the 0.47uf. Probably will get the next one down also.

On the tweet it seems to help focus and straighten the polars out from the new 2 tweet per baffle setup.
 
It seems being called a charlatan is not aggressive... pull the other leg.

I will repeat what I said.

""Do not confuse detailing why your explanations are incorrect.... with aggressiveness.""

I have not called you anything like that. I would hope you can limit your aggressive responses to those who deserve such.

Are you saying that there is something stored? Please be more precise.

It does not matter how an inductor is driven. If there is current, there is stored energy.

Inductance, by definition, is the relationship between the current within a system, and the magnetic field stored energy within that system.

jn
 
Re Ohm's 'law', it's actually not a law but rather a definition, as resistance has not yet been defined before the 'law' is stated. Real laws are relations between already existing quantities under given conditions and assumptions. (for example, the energy stored in a capacitor: W=½CU^2). I can remember also my high school teacher admonishing not to call the defining equation of resistance 'Ohm's law', and I understand that, for if we do, it's kinda chicken and egg logic IMO. Maybe 'Ohm's relation' would be a more appropriate term.
And we'd have Newton's relations of motion as well.

After two hundred years of playing with carbon, galvanometers and batteries and making "observations" that "Ohm's relation" is correct, I think we could finally call it a law.
 
You've not come across them before in crossovers or on the output of amplifiers?

I use zobels to match a t-line when the load is insufficient to prevent reflections.

Your use after the crossover, across the tweeter, seems like it's just a means of tailoring the sound to your liking. As such, I think you may be better off just playing with values until you are happy.

jn
 
Status
Not open for further replies.