John Curl's Blowtorch preamplifier part III

Status
Not open for further replies.
OK I bothered to search and as far as I can tell 'ears only' as two words started in 2012. Before then ( back to the beginning of this forum) the story was the same but was phrased 'trust your ears not your brain'. I understand this as do many others and I 'personally' don't have an issue with the way for a decade this was fairly patiently explained to wave after wave of wannabe golden ears who joined.

Although I still think having not understand this "in toto" overall it seems to be clear; and I agree without doing an observational study it's probably an open question.

miss SY. I am aware others don't, but I think the forum is poorer for his absence.

It's a mixed feeling; I appreciate knowledge and good discussions (based on diverging point of views) but don't like complaints about (allegeded) misbehavior of others in a discussion while using everything the playbook of eristics has to offer, and the nerve to fall in silence when asked for evidence that obviously is not there.
 
Jackob: We sadly cannot get back to the way things were discussed in the usenet days, or the clarity of a discussion round a table over beers. DIYAudios greatest strength (light moderation) is also its greatest weakness. It does require a lot of self control in some cases. You are relatively unflappable, others less so. Makes for some discussions becoming 'interesting'.

I also note that people with a more academic background are more used to robust debating over very small points and some may come across as belligerent and argumentative to those who have not had the pleasure. Pidgeons* and PhDs can look similar from a distance 🙂 . Not all but we have a few who post here.

*It's a valid spelling and my muscle memory is programmed for it.
 
Nah, "undercut your audio business" is typical for conspiracy theories, no evidence, no facts but therefore the belief is even strengthened .
Obviously the audio field is a complex matter and I understand that people lacking knowledge find "FUD" everywhere, but there is only one remedy, educate yourself and no, Peter Aczel's opinion papers aren't sufficient.

Fooling yourself is the easiest part but if you want to be a real objectivist, you have to stop it some day. 😉
Advice from the one who posts for his audio business... hmm, what could possibly be the motive.
It's a mixed feeling; I appreciate knowledge and good discussions (based on diverging point of views) but don't like complaints about (allegeded) misbehavior of others in a discussion while using everything the playbook of eristics has to offer, and the nerve to fall in silence when asked for evidence that obviously is not there.
So you complain about the complaints. 🙄
 
and varnish taking months to cure.

Thin coats of boiled linseed oil oxidise within a few days. Shellac dries up within minutes and is solid within 24 hours - elementary wood finishing. The various concoctions made up and tested have never satisfactorily explained the ability of the early Cremona violins to project sound all the way to the back of an orchestral hall.

It is the wood that matters. After most of the tall spruce trees were cut down to make ship masts, the foresters made their way up into the Carpathian Mountains to log spruce from the last virgin stands in Europe. Getting the logs down to the rivers was done in the winter time, by building vast water chutes coated with ice. The luthiers from Cremona would stand in the valley beside a chute, and listen to the sound of logs hurtling down the mountain. Every now and then, a particular frozen log would ring out with a bell like tone, and it was these logs that were chosen for their sonic properties to make violins.

A really good violin weighs just a few ounces.

tapestryofsound
 
I would argue that its the skill of the Luthier that REALLY matters 🙂

Yes, you entirely right....it is incredibly difficult to become a master luthier. Most violins are made in workshops by teams of individuals specialising in one particular aspect of construction. Some are good at varnishing, or carving backplates, or maybe have an affinity for working with ebony. As there are around 4500 recognisable steps in the construction of a violin, it takes a very long time to become a master luthier. Yes, the quality of tone woods does matter, but even the most highly skilled luthier can make a beautiful violin that in comparison to the best of the best, sounds like a dog. And they become seconds - still highly sort after, but not quite as good as the real thing. Even then, a violin has to played continuously for anything up to a hundred years, before they really sing out. There is nothing wrong with new violins, they just sound new.

This is a lot more fun than talking about speaker cables. 🙄

tapestryofsound
 
One of my lecturers at uni was trying to study what made a great violin. He used to sit there sanding away at bits of wood. ISTR his conclusion was that, for 99% of violinists carbon fibre was the future as you could guarantee a good sound, but not necessarily a great one. But an awful lot less hit and miss than wood bodied models.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.