48 VDC from 60 V unregulated

Status
This old topic is closed. If you want to reopen this topic, contact a moderator using the "Report Post" button.
Hi, I need to obtain a regulated voltage of 48V (at least 500 mA) from a unregulated PSU of about 60V. This one is derived from a transformer with dual secondary outputs, one 10 VAC the other 28 VAC, both delivering 2 A (thus having 38 VAC properly linked).
I can have essentialy two options I think:
1) LM2576HVT
2) LM317HV or TL783.

Any other suggestion instead these ones? Thanks.
 
As you have no more than 60V-48V=12V across the regulator, an ordinary LM317 can do unless you risk overload of the regulator output.

10Vac+28Vac is in the low end for 60Vdc rectified. In particular when you pull 0.5A.

Yes it was the first thing I thought and bought from ebay a LM317HV but not worked (maybe faulty or chinese trash). In the past I used combination of mosfet and bjt for higher voltage but lower current successfully.
 

PRR

Member
Joined 2003
Paid Member
.
 

Attachments

  • indaco.gif
    indaco.gif
    3.4 KB · Views: 301
Account Closed
Joined 2018
As you have no more than 60V-48V=12V across the regulator, an ordinary LM317 can do unless you risk overload of the regulator output.

10Vac+28Vac is in the low end for 60Vdc rectified. In particular when you pull 0.5A.


I agree.
An LM317T heatsinked properly would be my choice, and I've done these many times.
A 270 ohm off the output in series with a 10 or11K resistor to ground, and the junction of the resistors to the "adjust' terminal on the LM317T.
Adding a 10u cap across the 10 or 11K helps stability.
 
Adding a 10u cap across the 10 or 11K helps stability.
...and will also kill a regular 317: it will act as a slow start, meaning the regulator will see the whole input voltage during startup.

Using a floating, low-voltage reg in high voltage applications on the pretext that it only sees the difference voltage works well on paper, in sim, but not so well in reality.

A TL783 is more sensible solution, but if high performances aren't required, a simple transistor+zener reg is perfectly sufficient.

It can be protected if it needs to, and the zener can be bypassed to shunt its noise
 
I agree.
An LM317T heatsinked properly would be my choice, and I've done these many times.
A 270 ohm off the output in series with a 10 or11K resistor to ground, and the junction of the resistors to the "adjust' terminal on the LM317T.
Adding a 10u cap across the 10 or 11K helps stability.

Well, it still is 60V-48V=12V -> 12V*0.5A=6W of heat that heeds to get dissipated.

Assuming an ambient temperature of 40°C max and an RTHjc of 5°C/W for the LM317 we still have to deal with 125Tjmax - 40°C - 5°C*6W = 55°C for the heatsinks calculation. So the heatsink must be better than 55°C/6W = 9.17K/W to get the job done at full load and running the LM317 at 125°C junction temperature. I wouldn't recommend that.

A reasonable "big" heatsink with 3-4K/W would be adequate for temperatures like:

40°C + 3K*6W = 58°C (barely to touch - 40°C + 4K*6W = 64°C

So forget about getting away with a flimsy TO-220 metall sheet heatsink like these:

https://www.mouser.de/datasheet/2/670/hss-b20-np-12-1312554.pdf

You may get away with these if you only have 0.5A peak requirements and a much lower steady current demand.

Just saying.
 
Elvee definitely is right - it is better to do it without 10u caps, or make it with all two reverse protection diodes, as it is in the datasheet.
The diodes will not protect against this condition, you would need a transil across the regulator.

Here is an example of simple regulator, equipped with an overcurrent protection and a zener bypass:
 

Attachments

  • 48Vpsu.png
    48Vpsu.png
    77.9 KB · Views: 182
  • PSU48.asc
    1.7 KB · Views: 24
Account Closed
Joined 2018
...and will also kill a regular 317: it will act as a slow start, meaning the regulator will see the whole input voltage during startup.

Using a floating, low-voltage reg in high voltage applications on the pretext that it only sees the difference voltage works well on paper, in sim, but not so well in reality.

A TL783 is more sensible solution, but if high performances aren't required, a simple transistor+zener reg is perfectly sufficient.

It can be protected if it needs to, and the zener can be bypassed to shunt its noise


As I previously mentioned, I specified an LM317T regulator.
 
Account Closed
Joined 2018
Well, it still is 60V-48V=12V -> 12V*0.5A=6W of heat that heeds to get dissipated.

Assuming an ambient temperature of 40°C max and an RTHjc of 5°C/W for the LM317 we still have to deal with 125Tjmax - 40°C - 5°C*6W = 55°C for the heatsinks calculation. So the heatsink must be better than 55°C/6W = 9.17K/W to get the job done at full load and running the LM317 at 125°C junction temperature. I wouldn't recommend that.

A reasonable "big" heatsink with 3-4K/W would be adequate for temperatures like:

40°C + 3K*6W = 58°C (barely to touch - 40°C + 4K*6W = 64°C

So forget about getting away with a flimsy TO-220 metall sheet heatsink like these:

https://www.mouser.de/datasheet/2/670/hss-b20-np-12-1312554.pdf

You may get away with these if you only have 0.5A peak requirements and a much lower steady current demand.

Just saying.


You must have not read the part where I stated: "An LM317T heatsinked properly......"
 
Status
This old topic is closed. If you want to reopen this topic, contact a moderator using the "Report Post" button.