Audionirvana new "classic series" FR without whizzer cone

Status
Not open for further replies.
Yes, extensively to an original pair. Long story short, Alan did ultimately post links on the original 'full-range' forum to some design details and well done measurements that mirrored what me and others heard at an Atlanta DIY Meet demo many years ago, but AFAIK the links were never listed on the Babb website.

I saved them all, but unfortunately they're on a damaged HD that won't let me access the partition where the folder is, so all I have available are his averaged measured specs of the units I have and the pdf [with specs] of the slightly later, revised 'as released' design.

GM
What were your impressions? Didn't people say that they had exceptional off-axis linearity for a fullrange driver?
 
LC-1A since it's a true coaxial with a separate cone [super] tweeter embedded in the woofer motor with a 1st order XO designed for a nominally flat frequency, phase response both on and off axis out to >10 kHz and only -3 dB/>15 kHz @ ~20 deg off axis according to Harry Olson's early polar response measurements.

If not impossible, an actual 1st order response in a dual concentric coaxial seems ideal to me for personal playback applications. Synergy for high output live, etc. Why hasn't the former been done more?
 
Very limited market and/or high cost would be my guess. IME, most folks either don't hear very well and/or don't much like a 'HIFI'/'accurate' presentation. I mean consider how many prefer to go to the opera or at least an opera house to hear music rather than a big speaker array concert.

GM
 
I noticed. 😉 Speaking of which, how goes the book?

Mostly done thanks; making some final revisions that have me pulling my hair out. I need to make a final trip to the archives Wednesday / Thursday, mainly to try to answer a side-question that I was asked to look into regarding a vessel name-change. Not the cheapest of exercises. On the positive side, I'll get to search through some more pictures for a published version.
 
What were your impressions? Didn't people say that they had exceptional off-axis linearity for a fullrange driver?

Yes, this was my main gripe! In my 16 ft wide room, LP 14 ft back, a single speaker splashed sound off the side walls in front of the LP, so no hope in stereo except up close and personal; that, and it had some strong peaking centered around 7 kHz IIRC that set teeth on edge with way too much sibilance.

According to Alan though, his primary market for the Lorelei was HT contractors that wanted even more off axis response, which made no sense to me based on THX layouts unless they wanted just one driver for all channels.

The basic concept is just what I'd design though in a small, 'cost no object' project.

GM
 
spooky good memory, GM
 

Attachments

  • lc1a_polar.gif
    lc1a_polar.gif
    168.2 KB · Views: 465
Very limited market and/or high cost would be my guess. IME, most folks either don't hear very well and/or don't much like a 'HIFI'/'accurate' presentation. I mean consider how many prefer to go to the opera or at least an opera house to hear music rather than a big speaker array concert.

It's really a shame. I think loudspeaker drivers like the RCA LC-1A should be commonplace today. I also think that loudspeaker systems should still be around 100dB/watt/meter, and no less than 93dB/w or so for small systems, even desktop loudspeakers.. using low mass paper cones, of course. But, oh well..

Edit:
http://www.parts-express.com/pe/showdetl.cfm?partnumber=264-909
http://www.parts-express.com/pe/showdetl.cfm?partnumber=264-875

..For example. Just ridiculous. Drivers like these, and 1" chinese full-rangers with max SPL in the 70's are now commonplace. I don't like the direction audio systems have gone, and I'm not even 30 yet. I still have a pair of large planar hybrids that have been collecting dust for several years, rated at 83dB/w. Blew up a couple nice amplifiers with them. I've owned my share of other inefficient loudspeakers in the past. Since then, I've learned that low sensitivity is not the way to go. A balance between sensitivity, size, and reasonable crossover slopes has been my preferred method of choice.
 
Last edited:
Well, I went ahead and ordered a pair of the 12 inch Classic with the ferrite magnets. I've had a few full range drivers in my system before- all Fostex, and i never really could get to enjoy them. I let these break in for a few days with some good LF heavy material, and they are coming around nicely. The bottom end is very impressive, and well controlled in the accidentally functional 6.8 cu.ft TL cabinet I've temporarily mounted them in.

The top end is really excellent- extended, a little too hot in fact, so I've added a nobel and BSC filters to help keep the rising response in check. I'm sure given more time I'll be able to get the best from them.

I'm impressed enough to keep them, and go about building one of the big manifold horn cabs for them… I'm quite happy for $350.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.