John Curl's Blowtorch preamplifier part II

Status
Not open for further replies.
Disabled Account
Joined 2012
DBTs are necessary for experiments involving human senses or other physiological responses. If no controls are used, what you've got is empty claims with no value other than to keep the true believers believing.

I think we all understand that point thoroughly and accept it for its scientific value.

Though we do it everywhere, the results can be wrong and often are..... pharma drugs is the big volume data base example.... But it still has to be done to determine the truth of the matter as best we can. It is just too hard to do it so thoroughly with all now and future knowledge (?) factored in to make it forever bullet proof.

I would not expect anyone not hired and being paid to spend hours and years in doing such tests on short and longer term trials to give such rigorous lab results here. And, always asking for such seems silly under the circumstances. So a consensus decision is used with limited controls.......


THx-RNMarsh
 
Last edited:
I would not expect anyone not hired and being paid to spend hours and years in doing such tests on short and longer term trials to give such rigorous lab results here. And, always asking for such seems silly under the circumstances. So a consensus decision is used with limited controls.......

That's a really lame excuse for not doing even the most basic controls before making extraordinary claims. And for lots of questions (e.g., "can I hear the difference between cap A and cap B?"), it's easy to set up and run the tests.
 
Funny thing happened when listening to the Chesky System Disc.

I found problems with my system. When I got it right and listened
I could hear, center stage low med large.
1/2 way stage left, father stage left, and off stage left.
Same with right channel.
Then an arc from left to right and right to left.

You can really hear it when it you have your system
working properly.

When your system has problems you'll know.
Especially when you are changing out components
in a system, it's easier than you think to connect
something incorrectly and it still works.


CENTER CHANNEL
Haven't even tried the center channel thing. I should though.
do you use Left + and Right + to one center speaker?
or have to use a pre and a have 5 output amp?
I"ve got a Carver CT-17 preamp...I just need
another amp other than left right I think.
 
Last edited:
I'm still looking for the screamer on the Dark Side of the Moon.

Oh, wait you weren't talking about the Pink Floyd singer.

There's and album/production that is not only amazing,
but has captivated millions and millions of listeners.
I would venture to say even listeners with multiple
copies of the same album/disc/tape/ "media" perhaps.

What is it that makes this so special to so many people?
 
Disabled Account
Joined 2012
That's a really lame excuse for not doing even the most basic controls before making extraordinary claims. And for lots of questions (e.g., "can I hear the difference between cap A and cap B?"), it's easy to set up and run the tests.

What claims did I make? I think you are confusing me with someone else again as to audible claims.

In the DA article I said this at the beginning and then this at the end -->

" Dielectric absorption was investigated as its nature appeared to resemble the subjective description being given to capacitors, esp electrolytic types". These subjective comments were being described by others - in print.

And, at the last paragraph.... "These photographs may help to give another dimension to the subject of D.A. distortion; they aid in providing a feel for the significance of dielectric absorption for audio".

No where have I said I heard this or heard that in listening to caps. Maybe you are thinking of W.Jung or the POOGE chronicles of modifying gear? But you wont find me saying I heard anything. Just measurements/info. and questions.



THx-RNMarsh
 
Last edited:
Disabled Account
Joined 2012
CENTER CHANNEL
Haven't even tried the center channel thing. I should though.
do you use Left + and Right + to one center speaker?
or have to use a pre and a have 5 output amp?
I"ve got a Carver CT-17 preamp...I just need
another amp other than left right I think.


There were several ways... at the preamp output with summing resistors and level control... to just placing a speaker in series with the L and R common before the amp (-). spkr terminal. That gives the crude affect but destroys DF etal. But quick way to get the feel for how solid the center channel image will be without another PA.

I first tried it from Paul Klipsch use of a center speaker between his widely spaced 3-way corner horn system which needed a center "fill".


-RNM
 
Last edited:
What claims did I make?

Here's one that I found with 30 seconds of looking:
For those readers unfamiliar with the "sound" of capacitors or this general subject area, much of the above might sound like mad ravings to some degree or another. We'd like to leave some implication of what we feel the magnitude of this problem really is.
After we had gone through all of the above exercises and exorcised our complete system of unnecessary or poor-quality capacitors, the total degree of improvement was greater than any other improvement measure ever employed. With no capacitors (or clean capacitors), you begin to hear the music in a new light, one which is much more like the sound of the real thing. In fact, you will be able to differentiate subtleties you never before even realized existed. Your system simply becomes a new system, in terms of resolution and definition. The "solid-state sound" we've all heard discussed may be largely due to lousy electrolytics�which by and large never got used in the signal path in the tube days.

Of course, my comments weren't limited to claims about cap sonics.But since you brought that one up...
 
Disabled Account
Joined 2012
Thanks for allowing me to clear this up. Those are Walt's Words and opinions and his writing.

FYI -- He wrote the whole thing without me. He also went into his audio listening description in POOGE in detail. wiring changes, super reg power supplies and all. Again, not any of my words in those. The 'we' he refers to are all those people who helped him and gave feedback on mods.

I have never in print said I hear these things. Glad to clear that up.

I dont know anything about his listening methods.

Got any that I penned?


THx-RNMarsh
 
Last edited:
Disabled Account
Joined 2012
Personally, I think that Walt was right about caps, sonically. No cap is the best cap. Good caps are available that are OK.

Though those words were Walt's, I have no reason to think he just totally fabricated any of it. he is a credible person IMO. I think he believes what he wrote. I beleived him. And, so many people did cap upgrades by now, I tend to believe it is audible. But do I hear all these things Walt and other's hear? No, I do not.

In fact, I do not hear a lot of what others perceive. I did a cap comparison once in LA...... With the same mfr and only the plate material changed, it took us 4 hours to reach a consensus on if there was any difference. I'll tell you this... the difference is so small I dont care about it. IMO. Same with super reg PS. And, resistors. For my HPAmp, with the exception of 2 dale resistors, I used Radio Shack resistors and nothing special... electro caps and the THD is down close to -120dB and it sounds fantastic to me. Now, if I were to mfr it, I would use slightly better parts but not the finest on the planet. But that's just me. I am too practical for ultimate. JC owns that realm.

But, I still will not say no one can perceive what I cannot.


THx-RNMarsh
 
Last edited:
Administrator
Joined 2004
Paid Member
Hi Richard, Stuart,
I would not expect anyone not hired and being paid to spend hours and years in doing such tests on short and longer term trials to give such rigorous lab results here. And, always asking for such seems silly under the circumstances. So a consensus decision is used with limited controls.......
We all know that amateurs, hobbyists will spend a great deal of time and money on anything they determine is important to them. So maybe all that is needed are directions that would allow any serious group of people to execute controlled listening experiments. I would bet that most would be very happy to have guidance in order to do it properly. These people can be deadly serious about their work and how valid it might be. After all, most folks do want to do a job as well as they can. Hobbyists even more so.

Please note that there is a world of difference between someone on the sidelines who likes to talk about this stuff, and those who actually will or have done the work. Being validated is very important to most people who are a hobbyist. There are several hobbyists that I know who have more expertise on their chosen subject that a lot of professionals who work in the field. This shouldn't really surprise anyone.

-Chris
 
AX tech editor
Joined 2002
Paid Member
This may be where arguments begin...... Many people, who are not trying to establish fact, will just agree they hear no change or they do. And, from a consensus of opinion based upon the majority hearing IT (or not) the same described way... will accept THAT and move on. They dont need to know if it is because of material behavior or jitter or what ever. Nor a DBLT.

Sometimes, a correlation may exist between a test and listening descriptions which seems plausible. But if it is important enough to want to figure out why the 'as if' exists (and it does if a majority hear it), then by all means figure it out scientifically and add it to the explanation of what is heard. Though the 'center channel' affect heard isn't made more true by it.

Comment ,pls?


THx-RNMarsh

My only comment would be that 'the truth' is not subject to democratic vote. History is full of masses that follow an idea or a belief that is later (when properly researched with 'the scientific method') proved to be false. Like this attached classical.

Jan
 

Attachments

  • mars canals compressed.pdf
    14.2 KB · Views: 43
Status
Not open for further replies.