That seems like a reasonable table of values to minimise the resistance variation due to temperature induced effects when very high transient signals pass through.
A normal F5 runs on +-25Vdc supply rails so the table could be completed by adding in a 20Vpk output and using a 600mW resistor. We are back to the original now.
Andrew,
I wonder if you'd consider adding a couple of columns for me.
+- rail voltage and maximum output power.
I think alot of builders would find it very useful (I certainly would).
Regards
Andy
There seems to be a fundamental disagreement on the voltage drop from the +-V supply rails to the maximum voltage peak delivered to a resistive test load.
A table of supply rail to max power cannot be done until that disagreement is removed.
A table of supply rail to max power cannot be done until that disagreement is removed.
The Panasonic ECG resistors can take a lot of punishment -- but they do like to be off the PCB a bit so air can circulate.
For best sonics, imo, oversize ALL resistors.
My rule of thumb is to run them at <50% rating.
_-_-bear
My rule of thumb is to run them at <50% rating.
_-_-bear
and when in the feed back loop ~10%For best sonics, imo, oversize ALL resistors.
My rule of thumb is to run them at <50% rating.
_-_-bear
me? reasonable?
Ha!
I also like fat traces and big pads... space on the board (if possible)...
_-_-bear
Ha!
I also like fat traces and big pads... space on the board (if possible)...
_-_-bear
I also like fat traces and big pads... space on the board (if possible)...
_-_-bear
Same here. It doesn't cost any more to leave more coopper on the board so why not? The extra space costs but I don't care.
me? reasonable?
Ha!
I also like fat traces and big pads... space on the board (if possible)...
_-_-bear
Duly noted😀😀😀
I also like fat traces and big pads but I also like compact boards.
I don't see the need to have a crowded board if it isn't neccessary.
I don't see the need to have a crowded board if it isn't neccessary.
Especialy when things get hot
Alternative would be to gang-shabang for 10R in TO-126.
Means switching positons of R5/R6 and the testpoints, to make room for a heatsink.
(Caddock MP915 for under $2 or Bourns PWR221T at $1.35, for 100 up)
Means switching positons of R5/R6 and the testpoints, to make room for a heatsink.
(Caddock MP915 for under $2 or Bourns PWR221T at $1.35, for 100 up)
I don't see the need to have a crowded board if it isn't neccessary.
Fair enough.
They're not crowded at the moment anyway.
Alternative would be to gang-shabang for 10R in TO-126.
Means switching positons of R5/R6 and the testpoints, to make room for a heatsink.
(Caddock MP915 for under $2 or Bourns PWR221T at $1.35, for 100 up)
Jacco,
What are the pin spacings for those?
Jacco,
Found the datasheets for both models.
They are both 5.08mm spacing so are already catered for on the boards.
🙂
Found the datasheets for both models.
They are both 5.08mm spacing so are already catered for on the boards.
🙂
Heat sinks for rectifiers are big enough? In my F4s 8 Hexfreds heat up a black anodized 300mm x 300mm x 6mm aluminum ground plate to almost 60°C (after a day or so).
Regards
Sven
Regards
Sven
- Status
- Not open for further replies.
- Home
- Amplifiers
- Pass Labs
- F5 Turbo Circuit Boards