6e5p WCF headphone amp with no cap! - diyAudio
Go Back   Home > Forums > Amplifiers > Tubes / Valves

Tubes / Valves All about our sweet vacuum tubes :) Threads about Musical Instrument Amps of all kinds should be in the Instruments & Amps forum

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 20th May 2012, 10:47 AM   #1
mogliaa is offline mogliaa  United Kingdom
diyAudio Member
 
mogliaa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: London
Default 6e5p WCF headphone amp with no cap!

Hello!
I've been thinking about building a headphone amp with the following constraining designs:
1) OTL
2) Capable of driving my GRADO's impedance (32 ohms)

So given the above, looked at a simple white cathode stage using the lovely 6e5p in triode mode and using SY's great servo idea used in his Heretical preamp (The Heretical Preamp, p5) to remove the output cap.

To do so, we need a symmetrical HT supply. I'm sure this can be improved further, but a quick simulation shows that driving the valves at 45mA (a bit too hot perhaps) can deliver a low output impedance to around 16-20 ohms and distortion is an acceptable 0.25% at 90mVrms. I remember measuring my headphones and finding that 100mVrms was loud enough... (if I'm not mistaken).

Yes, 6e5p are running very hot and a lot of power is dissipated in their anodes, but is worth trying this in a breadboard to listen to?

6e5p is a great sounding valve and with no output cap, this seems to be a promising solution.

How could I improve this circuit?

Cheers,
Ale
Attached Images
File Type: png 65ep WCF headphone 1.png (24.4 KB, 655 views)
__________________
"A mistake is always forgivable, rarely excusable and always unacceptable. " (Robert Fripp)
http://www.bartola.co.uk/valves/
  Reply With Quote
Old 20th May 2012, 01:18 PM   #2
Bigun is offline Bigun  Canada
diyAudio Member
 
Bigun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Blog Entries: 2
Looks interesting to me !

I know you like this tube, but perhaps the 6BX7 gives more headroom for anode dissipation.
__________________
"The test of the machine is the satisfaction it gives you. There isn't any other test. If the machine produces tranquility it's right. If it disturbs you it's wrong until either the machine or your mind is changed." Robert M Pirsig.
  Reply With Quote
Old 20th May 2012, 11:34 PM   #3
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Athens
Reverse the polarity of HT2 in the scheme .
  Reply With Quote
Old 21st May 2012, 06:43 AM   #4
mogliaa is offline mogliaa  United Kingdom
diyAudio Member
 
mogliaa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: London
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dimitris AR View Post
Reverse the polarity of HT2 in the scheme .
HT supply value is -150, otherwise circuit won't work :-)
__________________
"A mistake is always forgivable, rarely excusable and always unacceptable. " (Robert Fripp)
http://www.bartola.co.uk/valves/
  Reply With Quote
Old 21st May 2012, 09:49 AM   #5
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Athens
I said there is a mistake in the polarity of HT 2 in the schematic the + pole is connected wrong in the cathode , You don't see it ?
  Reply With Quote
Old 21st May 2012, 09:51 AM   #6
mogliaa is offline mogliaa  United Kingdom
diyAudio Member
 
mogliaa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: London
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dimitris AR View Post
I said there is a mistake in the polarity of HT 2 in the schematic the + pole is connected wrong in the cathode , You don't see it ?
Yes I do see it. But having HT2 with a value of -150 is the same as inverting HT2 (i.e. negative side to cathode) with a value of +150....

thanks
Ale
__________________
"A mistake is always forgivable, rarely excusable and always unacceptable. " (Robert Fripp)
http://www.bartola.co.uk/valves/
  Reply With Quote
Old 21st May 2012, 10:17 AM   #7
DF96 is offline DF96  England
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Quote:
Originally Posted by mogliaa
How could I improve this circuit?
Add an output cap? For reasons of safety for you and your headphones. A cap ought to be more trustworthy than a servo, if only because it is simpler.

If you don't like the 'sound' of caps then you may have to invent a cap-less servo too.

R6 at 10M may be high enough to allow for thermal runaway in the upper valve. What does the datasheet specifiy as maximum grid resistor for this valve?
  Reply With Quote
Old 21st May 2012, 01:34 PM   #8
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
There are still two caps in the signalpath. What about doing it totally capless by using iron at the output?

R6 can as well be 100k.

Still a nice concept.
  Reply With Quote
Old 21st May 2012, 06:13 PM   #9
mogliaa is offline mogliaa  United Kingdom
diyAudio Member
 
mogliaa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: London
What about adding protection diodes at the output to protect the headphone from an unlikely failure of the servo circuit? I'd be able to avoid an unwanted electrolytic there.

Circuit still have an input cap and the cap on the servo. The input cap can be a good quality one as its value is 100-220nF. Need to tweak value depending on the servo resistor which as suggested with 100K then 220nF is ok.

Not sure what would be the sound impact of the servo op amp feedback cap?

@Lars: Yes going for an OT version could be probably the best option. Just was toying with the idea of an alternative OTL without output cap.

What if I parallel more valves to increase effective gm and reduce HT voltage? HT supply would be cheaper (and smaller that way).

Otherwise I may go for a simple spud using a good quality OT...any recommendations?

thanks
Ale
__________________
"A mistake is always forgivable, rarely excusable and always unacceptable. " (Robert Fripp)
http://www.bartola.co.uk/valves/
  Reply With Quote
Old 21st May 2012, 08:10 PM   #10
TheGimp is offline TheGimp  United States
diyAudio Member
 
TheGimp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Johnson City, TN
What if you combined the diodes with a pair of 62mA pico fuses in series with the supplies. You might need to drop your bias current slightly to be sure you don't blow the fuse during normal operation.

Increase R2 to 35R and R4 to 60R and your bias current drops to 52mA, Zo is around 17.6R, and THD is 0.12% at .109Vrms out. Anode plus screen dissipation drops to 7.8W
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Low power JFET WCF Osvaldo de Banfield Solid State 2 20th April 2012 12:10 PM
What would be the correct output cap for this OTL Headphone Amp? pingfloid Tubes / Valves 26 2nd January 2012 03:51 PM
6E5P Jaime Tubes / Valves 6 10th March 2011 07:17 PM
Humming from WCF but not SRPP Brit01 Tubes / Valves 5 22nd August 2010 08:37 PM
6e5p Vladi59 Swap Meet 0 18th March 2009 07:26 PM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 04:24 PM.


vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright 1999-2014 diyAudio

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2