Originally #50 posted by SY
R7 may not be needed. I've seen resistors used in that position to prevent oscillation, so perhaps that was the original function?
R6 adds noise, indeed, but this is a MM preamp, so compared with the equivalent noise resistance of the cartridge... say, wasn't that YOUR argument?
Hello,
the problem isn't that R6 "adds" noise ...
Does anyone know why there is a cascode stage at the input?
The attachment shows the "original" schematic
Kind regards,
Darius
Attachments
what about the noise caused by R6 ?
the problem isn't that R6 "adds" noise ...
dikarner said:both quotes are yours and somewhat contradictory. I think that's what Stuart tried to point out.
You've got email.
Sorry, I was away. I think the contribution of resistors to sonic quality is proportional to their voltage coefficient and to their noise at the particular position. But the major factor is the ratio of output voltage change per resistor value change (i.e. sensitivity). In other words, the larger is the change of the output voltage per resistor value change, the bigger is its influence to the sound. It also depends on whether they are connected to a high impedance or to a low impedance point. This is my theory, not necessarily true.dikarner said:Then I'm also waiting for oshifis to return and share his insights on the sonical improvements since using these resistors.
That said, I think the bigger influence points are R6, R7, then the RIAA resistors R8, R9, R10, and finally R12, R41, R42.
I can imagine a test where the resistors would be changed by 10% one-by-one and the output voltage change would be be precisely measured for each of them. Or use a SPICE simulation in order to determine the sensitivity of the output voltage to each resistor value change. Edit: where the resistance change is caused by the AC voltage on the resistor. The one causing the largest change has the most influence to the sound, and using an audio grade resistor is validated at that position.
I actually decided to go for the VARs (TX2575) - in some places the less expensive variety TX2352 from www.texascomponents.com
I am increasing the size of the coupling Cap(s) to around 180n get away with smaller gird resistors (100K is MUCH cheaper the 400K).
The Mills seem to be a good choice for the Anode-resistors which should be able to handle at a minumum 2 Watt.
I am increasing the size of the coupling Cap(s) to around 180n get away with smaller gird resistors (100K is MUCH cheaper the 400K).
The Mills seem to be a good choice for the Anode-resistors which should be able to handle at a minumum 2 Watt.
- Status
- This old topic is closed. If you want to reopen this topic, contact a moderator using the "Report Post" button.
- Home
- Amplifiers
- Tubes / Valves
- Tube phono amp repair/redesign help wanted