If we remove the Miller compensation cap from the VAS stage, the slew rate will be greater more than can you imagine. But this will cause oscillations. The Rise time is a better estimation method of transient response in higher frequencies, because measured with all feedback loops in a given circuit (concurrent, nested etc) closed. But to me, it is more difficult to achive a good transient response in low frequencies. And more expensive because there is the power supply role here.janneman said:
Actually the slew rate is even larger than we think, because the amp doesn't show slew rate limiting even with max output. It shows a nice exponential rise time. This amp is faster than it looks.
Jan Didden
fotios said:
If we remove the Miller compensation cap from the VAS stage, the slew rate will be greater more than can you imagine. But this will cause oscillations. The Rise time is a better estimation method of transient response in higher frequencies, because measured with all feedback loops in a given circuit (concurrent, nested etc) closed. But to me, it is more difficult to achive a good transient response in low frequencies. And more expensive because there is the power supply role here.
Hi Fotios,
Yes I agree with that, but since the miller cap is needed in the practical implementation it is not very usefull to consider the slew rate - or rise time - without this cap.
I am not sure I understand your reference to the lf transient response. Are you referring to the lf square wave tilt?
Jan Didden
- Status
- This old topic is closed. If you want to reopen this topic, contact a moderator using the "Report Post" button.