Diamond buffers w. CFP outputs - diyAudio
Go Back   Home > Forums > Amplifiers > Solid State

Solid State Talk all about solid state amplification.

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 23rd January 2004, 03:35 PM   #1
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Sweden
Default Diamond buffers w. CFP outputs

This thread is a continuation of a discussion going on in the thread
about Per-Anders' CFB headphone amp. Since this started to turn
into a long threadjacking, I decided it was appropriate to do as
pavel suggested and start a new thread. Maybe the moderators
will try to move some of the old discussion over here.

The topic that arose and is the topic of this thread is the suggstion
to use CFP outputs in Diamond buffers instead of ordinary followers.
Maybe the topic is about CFP outputs in general too, we'll see.
  Reply With Quote
Old 23rd January 2004, 03:47 PM   #2
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Sweden
I have now done some more simulations to compare the two types
of buffers. I did a number of experiments yesterday, but it turned
out that in both cases the distorsion is so low that I had to increase
the resolution of the transient analysis to get a reasonable noise
floor. The simulations now take about two hours each on my machine,
so I only have two basic cases to present for now.

Since the main point was CFPs in the output stage vs. followers as
in the standard version of the diamond buffer, I have started with
a rather idealized case to try pinpointing the effects of this difference
only. I use ideal BJT models with only IS and BF specified and I use
ideal current sources in the input stage. The results seem to correlate
rather well with PMAs claim of a tenfold improvement in distorsion
when using CFPs.

Below follows the circuits I simulated. First the standard buffer

Note that the BJT models used for the input stage are intended
to be similar to small-signal devices and those for the output stage
similar to power devices.
Attached Images
File Type: gif diabuf_std_cir.gif (8.7 KB, 1304 views)
  Reply With Quote
Old 23rd January 2004, 03:49 PM   #3
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Sweden
And here is the CFP version. I use the small-signal type of BJT for
the "drivers" of the CFP pairs, and the power type for the "boosters"
(or output devices).

Also note that for both buffers, the pairs are perfectly complementary
by using ideal models.

Further note that I had to increase the emitter resistors in the input
stage to get approximately the same bias current in the output stage
for both cases. Both buffers run in class A with approximately 34mA
quiescent current through the output emitter resistors.
Attached Images
File Type: gif diabuf_cfp_cir.gif (9.0 KB, 1278 views)
  Reply With Quote
Old 23rd January 2004, 04:07 PM   #4
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Sweden
I used an input source of 5V pk, 10kHz in a 100 Ohm load (or 110
Ohm if one counts also the 10 Ohm "isolation" resistor) in order to
get rather high distorsion figures. The simulation was done using
a 21 cycle transient analysis, discarding the first cycle, and with a
mnimum time step of 100ps. I then ran a FFT on the input and
output signals using 0.5Mpoints and no windowing. There is no
trace of even-order distorsion at all when using perfectly
complementary transistor pairs, which concurs with earlier
experiments I have done on the effects of mismatching transistors.

The odd-order distorsion for the standard buffer is approximately
as follows:
3rd: -79dB,
5th: -106dB,
7 th -132dB

and the spectrum looks like this
Attached Images
File Type: gif diabuf_std_vout_5v_10khz.gif (12.6 KB, 1142 views)
  Reply With Quote
Old 23rd January 2004, 04:13 PM   #5
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Sweden
For the CFP version the distorsion figures are
3rd: -96dB,
5th: -112dB,
7th: -128dB

and the spectrum looks as below. There is more noise in this case.
For some reason the noise is present already in the input signal
which I don't quite understand since Spice uses ideal voltage
sources. Maybe it is some roundoff errors or some FFT artifact.
Hence, the higher order products are less reliable here, but we
clearly have a lower 3rd order distorsion than in the standard buffer,
but maybe there is a tendency towards slightly higher values for
high-order harmonics. The latter could be due to the noise artifacts
too, though.

Furthermore, please note that these are not to be treated as
absolute figures reflecting a real circuit, but only an attempt to
study the relative effects of followers vs. CFP outputs.
Attached Images
File Type: gif diabuf_cfp_vout_5v_10khz.gif (13.4 KB, 1111 views)
  Reply With Quote
Old 23rd January 2004, 04:54 PM   #6
pjacobi is offline pjacobi  Germany
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Hamburg
Send a message via AIM to pjacobi Send a message via MSN to pjacobi Send a message via Yahoo to pjacobi
Christer,

Is the effect you've seen class A vs class B?

I'd suggest running diamond alone case with higher Ibias so that it also stays in class A.

Then both versions should be more close together, especially using the ideal transistors.

Regards,
Peter Jacobi
__________________
--
YMMV
  Reply With Quote
Old 23rd January 2004, 05:25 PM   #7
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Sweden
They both run in class A. The load current swings about 45mA pp,
the current through the emitter resistors stay above 12mA all the
time and for the CFP case, the Ic of the power transistors stay
well above 5mA all the time.
  Reply With Quote
Old 23rd January 2004, 07:43 PM   #8
PMA is offline PMA  Europe
diyAudio Member
 
PMA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Prague
Christer,

nice work. Probably noise about -150dB level is not so important. Have you tried to increase R1 and R2 to get higher quiescent current? I would guess that this could lower THD values. And maybe decrease R3 and R4 values. This might be pretty tricky work to find an optimum.

Regards,
Pavel
  Reply With Quote
Old 23rd January 2004, 07:54 PM   #9
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Sweden
Quote:
Originally posted by PMA
Christer,

nice work. Probably noise about -150dB level is not so important. Have you tried to increase R1 and R2 to get higher quiescent current? I would guess that this could lower THD values. And maybe decrease R3 and R4 values. This might be pretty tricky work to find an optimum.

Regards,
Pavel
Maybe I have on some earlier occasion, with less resolution in
the simulation, but I think not. Both buffers seem to stay well
within class A, but maybe some more margin
would help. I might try that and maybe some other things, but it
is a bit tedious to do too many experiments when so long simulations are required to get useful data.

I did some experiments with R9 and R10 yesterday, but in shorter
simulations, where it was harder to distinguish noise and distorsion.
I tried 10, 100, 1k and 1G and out these values, 100 Ohms seemed
best, but the noise made those simulations less reliable for
comparisons.

Another question is also whether even these two types of
ideal BJTs are a reaonable combination.? Maybe the IS differs
too much to correspond to a realistic combinations? Well, anything
close to realistic would have to include a lot more parameters
anyway.
  Reply With Quote
Old 23rd January 2004, 08:07 PM   #10
ojg is offline ojg
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Norway
Thanks Christer, very interesting!

Maybe you can find the time to post some AC-plots with gain and phase also? You would need to use "real" transistor models for this though.

I don't think you should worry to much about the high-frequency noise. This is an artifact of the FFT. In the FFT window try switching between "Using extent of simulation data" and "Specify time range". In the text-box change the 4.999998ms to 5.0ms (numbers for example only, I think you see what I mean).
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
HDAM / Diamond Buffers Q RnR Solid State 0 21st April 2009 09:59 PM
A question about diamond buffers darian Solid State 41 3rd July 2008 01:20 AM
A question about diamond buffers darian Analog Line Level 3 24th June 2008 07:38 PM
Diamond buffers Nordic Parts 7 13th March 2007 02:13 PM
Mini Portable Headphone Amplifier, with Discrete Diamond Buffers cetoole Headphone Systems 3 30th May 2006 06:32 AM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 09:41 AM.


vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright 1999-2014 diyAudio

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2