|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Solid State Talk all about solid state amplification. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Did it Himself
diyAudio Member
|
Why is shunt perceived to be a better topology in terms of noise and regulation performance? Surely hum at the input will be equally attenuated by a series regulator as it uses feedback to maintain the output voltage at a constant level?
I can't understand why a series regulator would have the output corrupted with a triangle wave caused by the feedback, yet this wouldn't happen with a shunt. Or is this corruption just when using ICs? I am interested in simple discrete implementations mainly, but welcome comments on ICs, too. |
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Electrons are yellow and more is better!
diyAudio Member
|
Quote:
Have you read the gigantic thread about Super Regulator which I believe is far better than any shunt regulator.Super Regulator, collecting the facts If you are looking for a discrete circuit you can check how a LM431 is done but I doubt that you can make it better than the 431.
__________________
/Per-Anders (my first name) or P-A as my friends call me |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Tokyo, Japan
|
Richie:
>Why is shunt perceived to be a better topology in terms of noise and regulation performance?< It isn't, at least if you are looking at the voltage component of the regulator output >I can't understand why a series regulator would have the output corrupted with a triangle wave caused by the feedback, yet this wouldn't happen with a shunt.< The use of global feedback is a separate issue from the choice between series and shunt regulation. Feedback can be used in the design of both series and shunt regulators. >Or is this corruption just when using ICs?< Certainly the oft-mentioned TL431 IC shunt regulator does not have very good performance for audio applications. An impedance curve that rises steadily above 50kHz until it hits about 13~14 ohms in the 1~5MHz region, noise to spare... Incidentally, I do feel that shunt regulation has its advantages, but I believe that you may need to look in a somewhat different direction from the questions that you have been asking so far. A thread with (IMO) more pertinent information can be found here: http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/showt...006#post135006 hth, jonathan carr
__________________
http://www.lyraconnoisseur.com/, http://www.lyraaudio.com |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Did it Himself
diyAudio Member
|
Thanks guys, picked up a few things there. I think I will stick with my simple series regulator for now.
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: The Netherlands
|
Hi all,
I noticed that a series regulator can suffer from the capacitance over it's juctions.. this limmits the high frequency PSRR... still I would prefer series-rugulator with good HF decoupling just my 2 cts, Thijs |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Simplistic Mosfet HV Shunt Regs | Salas | Power Supplies | 2755 | Yesterday 11:53 PM |
| Simple Super Shunt and Simple Super Shunt w/CCS vs. JSR03/05 (and other series regs) | hollowman | Power Supplies | 44 | 7th October 2009 08:01 AM |
| Glow tubes as series regs ? | mach1 | Tubes / Valves | 4 | 28th April 2009 10:19 AM |
| Multiple regulator question... regs in series... | Nordic | Power Supplies | 3 | 22nd September 2007 03:35 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.10056 seconds (76.83% PHP - 23.17% MySQL) with 10 queries |