|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Solid State Talk all about solid state amplification. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#191 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Nico, could you please post the schematic that you are using right now ? That is the version i like most by intuition.
|
|
|
|
#192 |
|
diyAudio Chief Moderator
|
Also some info on the bias current used, test rails potential, and the power it achieved for 0.1% THD on 8 & 4 Ohm, will be welcome.
|
|
|
|
#193 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
I like it in BJT-only form, this has every chance to be a popular circuit.
I find the way you have drawn the schematic adds to the interest for me, not sure I can explain, but it looks nice
__________________
"The test of the machine is the satisfaction it gives you. There isn't any other test. If the machine produces tranquility it's right. If it disturbs you it's wrong until either the machine or your mind is changed." Robert M Pirsig. |
|
|
|
#194 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
|
It will be even more popular with values given.
![]() So now in this configuration we have 4,3mA input BJT's collector current, 15,9mA driver's current and an output BJT's quiescent current adjustable from 0 to 1,8A.
|
|
|
|
#195 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
|
These values are of course discussable, cause now I see that the second stage (driver) voltage gain should be significantly higher, so substantial reduction of 22 ohm emitter resistance must be done. Recalculation in progress ...
|
|
|
|
#196 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: algeria/france
|
Quote:
as output stage , reducing THD efficently , as displayed in the following graph. IQ is about 0.42A in both cases. |
|
|
|
|
#197 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
|
Quote:
![]() Please recheck THD with these new values.
|
|
|
|
|
#198 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: algeria/france
|
Quote:
than with a double EF final stage. The VAS is really too much loaded and this ruin this circuit capabilities wich are quite good given the schematic simplicity. Good work , Lazycat , anyway...
|
|
|
|
|
#199 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
|
It looks in this concept with 8 transistors, lateral MOSFET output's would give the best THD figures, loading the VAS less than other versions.
MOSFET driver is another option, maybe ... the best solution of this simple concept lies in the right driver/output configuration, as we have already discussed here.
Last edited by Lazy Cat; 14th August 2011 at 05:21 PM. |
|
|
|
#200 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
How about a BJT - Lateral Mos Szikley compound ? I really would prefer that the mosfets drive the speaker from the drain but i am not a power amplifier specialist.
|
|
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Symetrical schematics are alike plague in Brazil, do you like them? | destroyer X | Solid State | 151 | 1st July 2010 02:09 PM |
| Symetrical out low Zout | karsten21 | Tubes / Valves | 5 | 1st February 2010 10:19 PM |
| going balanced/symetrical - what benefits? | weissi | Solid State | 15 | 20th October 2007 08:06 AM |
| Symetrical field, is this? | Raka | Multi-Way | 6 | 14th September 2003 01:21 PM |
| Non-symetrical SMPS output | cm961 | Parts | 4 | 21st August 2003 10:27 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |