|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Solid State Talk all about solid state amplification. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Stupid question maybe...
![]() is it possible to make a darlington or a sziklai pair with the silicium transistor as driver and the germanium transistor as power device. and vice versa. and is the base-emitter voltage then 0.65+0.25=0.90 or 0.25+0.65=0.90 in a darlington configuration. and in the sziklai configuration does is remain that of the driver transistor so 0.25 for germanium or 0.65 for silicium. weird question i know, not the daily stuff but if someone knows the answer it would help me alot Thanks
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Virginia
|
I did it long time ago, using germanium power (ASZ family) in a asymetric configuration (I had only "pnp" type). The bad part was the thermal stability - it was hard to compensate and the germanium power trz where very sensitive to overheating. I burned up a lot of them due to thermal run-up.
Eventually I switched to Si and never looked back. |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: East Midlands, England
|
Can't say i have ever even thought about it until you brought up the subject
![]() I don't see why it can't be done, though i'll happily stand corrected. I feel sure it'd work both ways to, with either the germanium device as either the driver or output. The only thing i can think of is the different saturation voltages (collector to base) of the different devices. By the way, i have never worked with Germanium so i might miss something. But going on your base emitter voltages (agree about the silicon) then i reckon that you might be better off with a Germanium driver as the total voltage accross the devices should be less when approaching the rail voltage (you should have a greater voltage swing) but this will depend on current through the devices to. At least attempt to get similar transistor transition frequencies ![]() Like i say, these are just thoughts & may be totally divorced from reality I'll happily bow down to those with much greater knowledge than me.
__________________
"Never let your morals prevent you from doing what is right!" Salvor Hardin |
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
|
It can surely be done, but the big questions is why? Just about everything is bad about germanium transistors compared to silicon ones. You are very likely to get thermal instability, poor frequency response, poor slew rate and low power capacity. But of course, I would love to be corrected!
![]() Sometimes it can be fun doing odd things just because it is possible. |
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Dallas
|
Germanium transistors still have utility as comparators, especially
so when needing to control a MOSFET current source with very low dropout. Its Nelson Pass' Aleph pair I'm suggesting you use... I am fortunate to have a few hand matched complimentary pairs of small signal germanium transistors. I've had a long time to think on how best to abuse them. Obviously, you switch from Silicon to Germanium, the Voltage gap is less wide. Bias resistors in this style output totem scale smaller. This diagram is an oversimplified unity gain follower. And does not show the proper bias for germanium transistors, but gets the point across about how this pairing might work. The MOSFET gate tends to an equilibrium near its threshold. And this protects the Germanium collector from seeing too many Volts. Its a win-win for both components. You might wanna throw a Schottky across each emitter backwards. Just so's there's no possibility to reverse bias the germanium emitter into breakdown. That ruins Silicon, I don't know bout Germanium... And then a Zenier to further protect both the gate and collector. If something goes wrong, no reason to risk exploding rare antiques. Last edited by kenpeter; 31st March 2010 at 11:11 PM. |
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
|
There is one advantage I came to think of actually, and it is that the germanium trannies are much slower so you might not need to much freq compensation to make it stable.
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
|
Back in the sixties and early seventies, when cheap small signal silicon were available, but higher power devices were rare and expensive, most amplifier had a quasi complementary output using Ge power transistors.
Pick any 15~~30W design from that time, it will most likely use that configuration. |
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Well the story is i have about 30 ac187 transistors wich are NpN germanium transistors rated at 1w power dissipation with a Hfe of 300 or so.
And i want to build a headphone amp with these devices in the output and to make a quasi output configuration (so 2 NpN output devices) i can of course use the same AC187 to make a full germanium darlington for the positive side of the class AB follower but for the negative part i could use a germanium PnP transistor as driver, but i was just wondering if it is even possible to use a BC179 PnP (for example) silicon transistor in sziklai combination with a AC187. Note: i will use 2 NpN transistors in the output since i have so many of them and i already matched these devices in Hfe. And these AC187 transistors will also be used for the VAS stage and VBE multiplier in the bias circuit. So maybe somebody knows if this is possible |
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Kuala Lumpur
|
I never came across a germanium device with 300 Hfe
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Well these are military spec AC187 (gold pin) and the lowest one had an hfe of 117 and the highest was 387 these are accurate measurements.
I did these measurements with highly precise Philips measurement equipment and i did not beleave it myself either at first. until i checked these measurements with normal modern silicon transistors, and the measurement equipment was accurate. I know that an average germanium transistor has an hfe between 30 and 100 or so. But according the datasheets these AC187 transistors should have an hfe between 100 and 500 so this is normal for these types. But could someone specify if this configuration is possible?? I appreciate the comments but i still dont have an concreet answer on my question of the bc179-ac178 sziklai combi is possible because of the difference in base-emitter voltage. I am an retro freek so that is why i use all these ancient almost forgotten components but i am 22 years old so this is before my time and i need some advice from some of you people who actually saw these things new in store And i respect the level of knowedge of the people here and i have asked this question to everybody i know but they couldn't answer it. So please explain it in a relatively simple way, this would help me alot. Thanks guys. |
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Need Old Germanium transistor datasheets | Bakmeel | Parts | 9 | 3rd June 2009 07:43 PM |
| darlington transistor LTspice model ? | flacer | Solid State | 6 | 21st May 2009 12:36 AM |
| what are the best germanium transistor npn and pnp ?? | prorms | Instruments and Amps | 9 | 24th August 2008 12:42 AM |
| sziklai-darlington diamond buffer (SDDB) for power output stages | mtlin12 | Solid State | 5 | 1st April 2005 06:55 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.12958 seconds (82.30% PHP - 17.70% MySQL) with 11 queries |