
Home  Forums  Rules  Articles  diyAudio Store  Gallery  Wiki  Blogs  Register  Donations  FAQ  Calendar  Search  Today's Posts  Mark Forums Read  Search 
Solid State Talk all about solid state amplification. 

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving 

Thread Tools  Search this Thread 
17th May 2012, 01:29 PM  #201 
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Scottish Borders

4pr @ 150W each is 1200W of devices.
Divide by 6 to get 200W of maximum output power. 200W into 8r0 from 4pr of c5200
__________________
regards Andrew T. Sent from my desktop computer using a keyboard 
17th May 2012, 01:40 PM  #202 
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2012

okay ... thank you, for how many pairs of 5200 and 500W for the scheme which is right? sorry with my english

18th May 2012, 09:35 AM  #203 
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Scottish Borders

Kml,
what does post201 say? Why have you sent me a duplicate PM asking the same question? What are you playing at?
__________________
regards Andrew T. Sent from my desktop computer using a keyboard 
18th May 2012, 11:25 AM  #204 
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2012

I just want to understand more about the power of this, sorry

29th September 2012, 08:17 AM  #205 
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2007

My kind of compensation
Hello, I had the ideea to amplify the miller capacitor(if the transconductance permits) by a common base stage (to have gain without phase modification) and now we gain at least 2 things :
1. The miller cap can be decreased , we gain bandwith and SR ;you can try in your amps . 2. The miller cap in DC has almost 0 potential ,from here the noise of the miller cap is reduced . I tried on my amp and now it is very stable with the 12pF cap .Also on square wave signal . For the moment I don't want TMC because it introduce bad behaviour with capacitive loads .
__________________
"please try to listen to some music through the amplifier instead. Life is so short ..." Last edited by catalin; 29th September 2012 at 08:46 AM. 
29th September 2012, 12:19 PM  #206 
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Scottish Borders

Hi,
nice idea. Keep us informed of how it works when listening and when speakers work the output stage. How did you determine the values of R12, R13, R22 & R23? How did you determine the values of C1 & C5?
__________________
regards Andrew T. Sent from my desktop computer using a keyboard 
29th September 2012, 11:07 PM  #207 
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2007

Hi Andrew ,
In listening test I don't see difference until now,maybe a little on the treble ,being more clear only on some parts of musical pieces .But it is just a personal opinion or a placeboeffect .I need to listen more to detect difference. R12 is set to 10k to linearise a little the thermal deviation from BD139,we have there 0.2 mA through 10 k .In place of R13 practical there is a adjustable resistor with 5 kohm value or 1k series with 2.5k adjustable .It is shown in previous schematic ,version 4.7 and of course that is setting the current through the final stage .The resistors is a divider and is setting the voltage on the base of Bd139 .The current through BD139 is constant to 4.3mA so the divider can be calculated for the desired voltage Vce . R 23 is setting the current of the follower bjt therefore to have the smallest noise but also with good thd so 1k for 1mA is set .Also R23 depends by R7. R22 is there to set the maximum current through the follower and from here the maximum voltage injected in VAS .In transient signal or square wave the follower is reaching very high current which can destroy it .Therefore the maximum current is set to 3 mA with R22 .It is just a follower protected . C1 is coming from C>1/(2*pi*f*R) where f is the lowest frequency desired and R is the 10 K input resistence .But if we want to have the gain of the filter almost 90% from the 0 db then we shoul choose a value of 6 times bigger . I choosed a 5 hertz frequency not for the gain because I don't hear that f but I wanted a linear phase at low f .Therefore I choosed a C=6/(2*pi*5*10k)~19uF . The other filter R11+C5 must add a small load to the preamplifier/output opamp,etc .The reactance of the cap will be 1/wC where w is 2*pi*f .F is choosed 20khz .In this case the reactance of C will be 1/(2*pi*f*C)~80k . Therefore the smallest capacity, the smaller the load will be at high F like 20 khz , but we should not decrease it too much because we need also to limit the bandwith of the input signal .But .. For a SACD there are some test that prove that a 50V/us per 100W power is required, therefore the input filter should not add a degradation of the SR .I calculated the filter to limit the SR at almost 100V/us .If Rail to rail voltage of the amp is 70 volt and the amp can perform 100V/us then the t rise/fall is under 1us so also the input filter should not slow down under 1 us .I choosed a 0.6 us delay at input therefore if Time=R*C then C=T/R so 600pF would be the result .But also here to have the output voltage at 90% from 0 db then a 6 time smaller cap is good .The 6 number comes from the exponential function for 90% . Also another advantage to choose a filter with high R and low C is that the noise and distortion of the cap is smaller compaired with a greater capacity . I always prefer to have the smallest possible capacity by increasing the resistance in the circuits because the distortion of cap can't be simulated and also the resonance of their armatures .
__________________
"please try to listen to some music through the amplifier instead. Life is so short ..." 
30th September 2012, 08:10 AM  #208 
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: milan

MX5007
I'm successfully using a Chinese CFP offering outstanding stability thanks to a simple resistors separation between stages
VERY IMPORTANT: use final devices with very low hFE LJMAssembled MX50 SE Power amp kit Stero Amplifier boards  eBay
__________________
Please download my best audio idea https://www.facebook.com/DiyAudioHiEnd Last edited by TonyTecson; 30th September 2012 at 08:36 AM. Reason: removed moderator icon 
30th September 2012, 09:01 AM  #209 
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2007

Hi Stee ,Here wasn't issues from the final stage .If the drivers are fast enough the CFP stage has no issues .Here the issues was comming from the fast voltage amplifier stage behind the final .Because was difficult to compensate with small capacity like 12pF with normal Miller compensation .Because with this topology I wanted to have a slew rate about 100V/us .
But now is possible with this compensation.
__________________
"please try to listen to some music through the amplifier instead. Life is so short ..." 
1st October 2012, 10:13 AM  #210 
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: milan

low hFE means clean sound
ok but the speed is not the only quality
Motorola tries to use these then tell me check out the inverting input too is much more natural (with toroidal 50VA 10:1 230V24V)
__________________
Please download my best audio idea https://www.facebook.com/DiyAudioHiEnd 
Thread Tools  Search this Thread 


Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
Sziklai output  Moby  Solid State  68  27th January 2011 10:39 AM 
Hybrid Sziklai CFP  Stee  Solid State  0  27th December 2008 10:53 AM 
ccsloaded sziklai  ionomolo  Solid State  132  30th June 2008 06:39 AM 
My DIY project  Wonderfull Loudspeakers !  Emeric  MultiWay  6  9th May 2008 02:38 AM 
New To Site?  Need Help? 