Regulator for RIAA Preamp and Line Amp - diyAudio
Go Back   Home > Forums > Amplifiers > Solid State

Solid State Talk all about solid state amplification.

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 30th January 2008, 07:25 AM   #1
diyAudio Member
 
wrenchone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Silicon Valley
Default Regulator for RIAA Preamp and Line Amp

I've been messing around with simulations in preparation for breadboarding a regualtor for use with my "All American" RIAA preamp for MM cartridge (see thread in analogue). Attached is a schematic.
Attached Images
File Type: gif comp_reg1a.gif (53.1 KB, 801 views)
  Reply With Quote
Old 30th January 2008, 07:27 AM   #2
diyAudio Member
 
wrenchone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Silicon Valley
Attached is a simulated response to the load step shown in the schematic. What I want to know is, how are other high-speed regualtors(Sulzer, Jung) with a similar load step?
Attached Images
File Type: gif resp_reg1a.gif (66.6 KB, 613 views)
  Reply With Quote
Old 30th January 2008, 08:56 AM   #3
diyAudio Member
 
jan.didden's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Great City of Turnhout, Belgium
Blog Entries: 7
Quote:
Originally posted by wrenchone
Attached is a simulated response to the load step shown in the schematic. What I want to know is, how are other high-speed regualtors(Sulzer, Jung) with a similar load step?

This is quite high performance. The change of just 1.5mV at a step response of 20 mA (25mohm) is good, with a step that has 100nS rise- and fall times. A Jung goes down to a few milliohms at 20kHz, IF you do remote sensing (the wire/pcb track to the load will have more than a few mohms).

What would probably be more relevant to audio is the response to a step with say 10uSec rise- and fall times, or the PSRR with a 20kHz load.

Jan Didden
__________________
I won't make the tactical error to try to dislodge with rational arguments a conviction that is beyond reason - Daniel Dennett
Check out Linear Audio Vol 7!
  Reply With Quote
Old 30th January 2008, 09:38 AM   #4
diyAudio Member
 
Onvinyl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Germany
Hi wrenchone,
both nice design and interesting topic! Even more because I'm experimenting on a similar field at the moment. My second task is to compare a diff-amp reg as yours with an open loop 'regulator' both specwise and sonically, for intended lineamp and phonoamp use.

If someone could give some advice how I can perform your step response sim in LTSPice, I could repeat it for my circuits even with the same frame parameters. Is it just to connect a pulsed voltage source to the regulated line and watch Vout?

But first, I have a few questions regarding your design.

1) EDIT: <saw my mistake>

2) How is the voltage reference (R16/V1) made in the real circuit? I've found the actual implementation of the reference will 'top or flop' a regulators performance.

3) Both a cap across the v-ref (better still: R-C- filter) as well as R13 will seriously improve the overall performance, at least regarding noise and output impedance.
Is the impedance between both diff-pair inputs matched? The R of the mentioned R-C filter might provide help, if not.

4) I've seen somewhere elaborated (when memory serves me well on Rod Elliott's pages) that you don't gain advantages by using a CCS in a diff-par tail when using a current mirror. What is your reasoning for still using that CSS?

5) What is the purpose of R2?

For reference, *not* for dragging the thread OT, here is one of the circuits I'm trying at the moment and we could compare. V2 is a LM329DZ. I have an open loop shunt in the pipeline which I could post as well once I build it in reality.

EDIT: replacing Q1 with a mosfet betters performance about 20kHz throughout the bandwith, at least in sim. I'll try that out as well!

Rüdiger
Attached Images
File Type: gif wrenchanswer.gif (15.7 KB, 639 views)
__________________
"I can feel what's going on inside a piece of electronic equipment. I have a sense that I know what's going on inside the transistors." Robert Moog
  Reply With Quote
Old 31st January 2008, 08:15 AM   #5
diyAudio Member
 
wrenchone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Silicon Valley
Onvinyl -

I have several choices for Vref - a TL431 with resistor network, a reverse biased base-emitter junction as zener, or a stack of 4-5 green GaP LEDs. I'll probably use a big cap across the reference in any case as it slows up the output rate of rise at turn-on to reduce thumps.

The current source on the diff pair tail pins the bias current, even if it isn't strictly needed for comon mode rejection.

R2 reduces power dissipation in the JFET below it.

I may try replacing the bipolar diff pair with a couple of JFETs to allow more latitude in an RC filter for the reference. In that case , I may add sanother stage for more gain (depends on simulation results).

Janneman -

Nice to meet you at Burning amp. I chose the fast current slew rate to fully exercise the high frequency capability of the regulator. The interesting thing about this regulator is that it requires a big, fat cap with low (for an electrolytic) ESR for stability. A lot of fast regulators cannot tolerate much output capacitance without severe bandwidth reduction/oscillation. What you get here may be the best of both worlds - a big capacitor to supply some charge faster than the usual regulator can deliver, and a fast regulator to replenish said charge quickly. More tinkering will tell.
  Reply With Quote
Old 2nd February 2008, 08:49 PM   #6
diyAudio Member
 
wrenchone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Silicon Valley
Here is the same regulator with some nice jfets in the diff amp. Tail current was boosted to cater to the fet characteristics. I tried putting a current source loaded emitter follower between the diff stage and the output fet, but that made the simulation really weird and granular, even when the reltol was upped by a factor of 10. I went back to plain vanilla.
Attached Images
File Type: gif comp_reg_jfet.gif (14.1 KB, 435 views)
  Reply With Quote
Old 2nd February 2008, 08:53 PM   #7
diyAudio Member
 
wrenchone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Silicon Valley
This is the output response with attack and decay times slowed down to 10 usec each. The plot shown is just for the attack. The next thing I might try is to add some gain to the output sink stage with a P-channel mosfet or PNP booster. Some global feedback (compensation) would also be interesting to try.
Attached Images
File Type: gif comp_reg_jfet_res.gif (66.4 KB, 388 views)
  Reply With Quote
Old 2nd February 2008, 10:35 PM   #8
diyAudio Member
 
Onvinyl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Germany
Hi Wrenchone,

I still don't get how you set up your output response simulation. It would really be interesting to compare.

I build a version of my proposal with an additional E-follower and it indeed gave me severe and untamable oscillations.


It might be interesting to compare your results if your v-ref and/or the diff-pair would be referenced to the already regulated voltage line.


Rüdiger
__________________
"I can feel what's going on inside a piece of electronic equipment. I have a sense that I know what's going on inside the transistors." Robert Moog
  Reply With Quote
Old 2nd February 2008, 11:15 PM   #9
diyAudio Member
 
wrenchone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Silicon Valley
I had to download LT Spice to have a look, but what you do is right click on the current source, use advanced settings, and configure it as a pulsed current source. That's what I'm doing in PSpice, it's just that the pulsed current source is explicitly available in the sources menu without having to dig for it.

I don't think that referencing the current sources to the output will make any difference in the response, but the reference and tail currents will be a little quieter in practice. I'm going to do a some more messing around with sims, but I think soon I'll be ready to spin a prototype.
  Reply With Quote
Old 2nd February 2008, 11:19 PM   #10
diyAudio Member
 
wrenchone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Silicon Valley
One more note in passing - the current source on the diff pair tail is still needed for line rejection. It's true that the current mirror will tend to force equality in the pair currents, but unfortunately, the signal output from the diff pair is single ended, and any twitch in the tail current will appear at the output.
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Ultrasimple mm/mc RIAA preamp 2 Mad_K Analogue Source 329 25th March 2014 01:33 PM
Simple MM only RIAA preamp x-pro Analogue Source 60 1st November 2013 10:17 PM
Suggestions for RIAA preamp? coldcathode Tubes / Valves 17 7th March 2009 07:32 PM
RIAA Preamp Justcallmedad Solid State 4 2nd September 2005 01:52 AM
Search for a pre (RIAA+LINE+TUNER)with 12au7-12ax7. bronto64 Tubes / Valves 0 19th April 2004 08:50 PM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 08:58 AM.


vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright ©1999-2014 diyAudio

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2