Leolabs said:In the datasheet stated that:"Enhanced Replacement for LF347 and TLO84."
Of course it said, this is marketing of course.
The 713 is also decades old, and that recommendation is probably from the 80's?
Get something really better.
Jan Didden
I suggest two dual SMD types, one on either side of an adaptor board.
http://www.futurlec.com/PCBService.shtml
will do a good price on a small order, the only thing left to find is pins to go from the adaptor board to the original 14 pin DIP holes.
http://www.futurlec.com/PCBService.shtml
will do a good price on a small order, the only thing left to find is pins to go from the adaptor board to the original 14 pin DIP holes.
Sorry guys. Everything will depend on the source level to find a difference between any quad IC designed in the '80s or '90s.
The AD713 comes from the late '80s, and it's still considered one of the best there is. So I think it will all depend of the implementation.
The AD713 is better than the TLO84 though, and certainly more modern.
Now if you will compare a quad with single chips or even some dual ones, then that's different. You will find many chips around, DIP or SMD that will certainly improve on any quad.
The AD713 comes from the late '80s, and it's still considered one of the best there is. So I think it will all depend of the implementation.
The AD713 is better than the TLO84 though, and certainly more modern.
Now if you will compare a quad with single chips or even some dual ones, then that's different. You will find many chips around, DIP or SMD that will certainly improve on any quad.
- Status
- This old topic is closed. If you want to reopen this topic, contact a moderator using the "Report Post" button.
- Home
- Amplifiers
- Solid State
- TL084CN vs AD731