my new BIB (again...)

Status
Not open for further replies.
supravox signature 215 bicone
 

Attachments

  • supravox 001.jpg
    supravox 001.jpg
    41.9 KB · Views: 910
caisson RJ

OB is great for mid and high freq.
I dont want to miss bass . In BIB, the bass is very good and i
think the caisson RJ will produce good bass too.

i will try soon. picture of caisson RJ (mantra sound )
 

Attachments

  • dulcet.jpg
    dulcet.jpg
    8.8 KB · Views: 680
Claude,

Thanks for your replies. I like the sound very much. I have them mounted a 12x48in front panel with two hinged wing panels, one 10x48, and the other one 8x48. When I figure out how to post some pictures, I will do it. I'm embarrassed to say the wing panels are only fastened with duct tape. I just have not gotten around to a more permanent arrangement. Looks like your driver is mounted on a removable panel. Do you use this bib for other drivers? Thanks.

Jon
 
For interest's sake, 1/2 space plot showing the relative differences in LF performance between the drivers assuming the BIB cabinet dimensions refered to above. The 12in AN needs a much larger Vp to 'breath' (as in about 84ft^3)so I imagine that its LF & midband sounded somewhat choked & lacking in transient attack. To a lesser extent, I'd expect something similar from the Supravox, as that high Q also wants a very big pipe (about 45.5ft^3). YMMV of course & there are other factors to consider too. Personally, I'm a big fan of Supravox drivers, even though they generally need very large cabinets.
 

Attachments

  • comp drivers.gif
    comp drivers.gif
    20.5 KB · Views: 593
supravox 215 signature bicone

Scottmoose, please give me dimms for "perfect cabinet" for my
supravox 215 signature bicone.

thank you very much for the graph.spec. What do you think about
supravox TQWT design and the caisson RJ from SUPR. too ?



Claude
 

Attachments

  • image18do.jpg
    image18do.jpg
    14.9 KB · Views: 649
Scottmoose, please give me dimms for "perfect cabinet" for my supravox 215 signature bicone.

You could do it yourself easily enough via the various spreadsheet dimension calculators here: http://www.zillaspeak.com/bib-howtobuild.asp

As I mentioned, you'd need a very large cabinet of ~45.5Ft^3 (each), making for a box of 67.25in x 28.75in x 40.625in (internal HxWxD). Relatively weak motor + highish Vas = large Vp.

What do you think about supravox TQWT design and the caisson RJ from SUPR. too?

I prefer not to, in the former case. Nothing like enough volume. The latter is a trad. sort of cabinet, but not of a type I personally like all that much.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.