|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
The LM317 and LM337 commonly used to make a +/- power supply are pretty old now. I see lot of the more modern DACs are using newer low noise regulators like the LT1963 etc.
Does anyone know of a newer set of positive/negative regulators that are superior for audio use? |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: ..
|
use dual sec, dual bridges - then you can use the best performing reg for both polarities
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
I won't throw any rocks at the LM317/337 -- but we found that the Linear Tech LT1963A and LT3015 provided the most pleasing sound of any OEM 3-legged regulator when compared with 12 of their peers.
Noise is the least important criteria -- output impedance and PSRR seem to be more important factors in empirical evaluation of regulators. Nevertheless, listening always wins. There were regualtors which tested superbly but really screwed with the sound. |
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Hong Kong
|
tps7a3001, tps7a4901 ;-)
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Quote:
Yes, these sound nice: "One of the primary TPS7A30xx applications is to provide ultralow noise voltage rails to high-performance analog circuitry in order to maximize system accuracy and precision. In conjunction with its positive counterpart, the TPS7A49xx family of positive high-voltage linear regulators, the TPS7A30xx family of negative high voltage linear regulators provides ultralow noise positive and negative voltage rails to high-performance analog circuitry, such as operational amplifiers, ADCs, DACs, and audio amplifiers." They only come in MSOP-8 package though, at 3x3mm, it would be tricky to solder. Thanks for the suggestions! |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: ..
|
as I said - you don't need "the negative counterpart" you can use the same type for both polarity supplies by floating both secondary windings with respect to each other
which allows you to use the best reg you can find for both supplies - and use the same part # in both Last edited by jcx; 4th February 2013 at 12:02 AM. |
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Hong Kong
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Taiwan
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Quote:
I'm doing a design and layout right now with both parts being fed by a 16Vac half wave and I want +/-16Vdc out. That results in the incoming ripple going from 20.5Vdc to 21.5Vdc, too much for the LT1963A but OK for the LT3015 on the negative rail (-20.5Vdc to -21.5Vdc). So I borrowed the great idea that pete_shumacher recently posted here for his power filter of a diode (LED) drop from the rail feeding a series pass to drop 3V of incoming voltage for the LT1963A. So now it gets ripple that goes from 17.0Vdc to 18.0Vdc. Problem solved.
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| What is a better alternative for 317 337? | Sunsun22 | Power Supplies | 14 | 18th March 2011 09:38 PM |
| Mathematically challenged help for lm 317-337 | semi932 | Power Supplies | 18 | 5th January 2011 10:16 AM |
| 317/337 with current boost | jaudio | Power Supplies | 2 | 19th January 2007 06:42 PM |
| Troubleshooting 317/337 Regulator Circuits | TerryC | Parts | 5 | 12th August 2006 04:42 PM |
| needed 317/337 double regulation | jaudio | Power Supplies | 17 | 19th June 2006 07:24 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |