LT Dual Tracking 3A Regulated Power Supply 1.25V to 20V - diyAudio
Go Back   Home > Forums > Amplifiers > Power Supplies

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 13th February 2009, 04:16 AM   #1
okapi is offline okapi  United States
diyAudio Member
 
okapi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Buffalo
Default LT Dual Tracking 3A Regulated Power Supply 1.25V to 20V

In the data sheet for the LT1033 negative adjustable regulator there is a typical application schematic for a tracking regulator that i am interested in but don't understand. I like the simplicity of the design as all the tracking regulators i am familiar with use opamps.

here is the schematic from the data sheet

Click the image to open in full size.

here is the more common implementation as well as the formula for calculating resistor values to set the output voltage.

Click the image to open in full size.

my two questions are:

1. how do you adapt the formula to calculate resitor values for the tracking regulator?

2. how does the circuit match a voltage change at the output of one regulator in the other regulator?
  Reply With Quote
Old 13th February 2009, 04:33 AM   #2
diyAudio Member
 
leadbelly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Calgary, Alberta
Default Re: LT Dual Tracking 3A Regulated Power Supply 1.25V to 20V

Quote:
Originally posted by okapi
1. how do you adapt the formula to calculate resitor values for the tracking regulator?

2. how does the circuit match a voltage change at the output of one regulator in the other regulator?
1) If you want to build the tracking regulator, then use the values in the datasheet, don't recalculate.

2) As you adjust R3, then the resistance between the adj pin and gnd is symmetrically changed for both regulators (look at the resistor network formed by R2 R3 R4).
__________________
Aerodynamics are for people who can't build engines. Enzo Ferrari
  Reply With Quote
Old 13th February 2009, 04:44 AM   #3
okapi is offline okapi  United States
diyAudio Member
 
okapi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Buffalo
i believe the resistor values determine the output voltage - it is an adjustable regulator - so i need to at least know what the output voltage is for the resistor values in the schematic.

EDIT:

i think the second resistor in the voltage divider is made up of r4 and r3 in parallel. the effective value of R3 is acutally 2.5K not 5K as i originally thought.

using the above logic i calculate the output to be 22V. Still 2 volts too high so i must still not be accounting for something.

  Reply With Quote
Old 13th February 2009, 05:00 AM   #4
diyAudio Member
 
leadbelly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Calgary, Alberta
I just cannot get my head around what you are trying to say. You do realize that R3 is a potentiometer? When R3 is adjusted to 5K, the voltage is +/- 20V and when it is adjusted to 0 the voltage is +/- 1.25V.
__________________
Aerodynamics are for people who can't build engines. Enzo Ferrari
  Reply With Quote
Old 13th February 2009, 05:27 AM   #5
okapi is offline okapi  United States
diyAudio Member
 
okapi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Buffalo
ok - i think.

i do recognize that r3 is a trim pot.

can you run through a calculation for me with r3 set to 5k so i can better understand?

by my (i assume incorrect) calculations i get a voltage output of about 42 V when r3 = 5K
  Reply With Quote
Old 14th February 2009, 08:04 AM   #6
Bakmeel is offline Bakmeel  Netherlands
diyAudio Member
 
Bakmeel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: The Netherlands
okapi,

Essentially, you don't need to change the formulas in the single supply schematic to adjust it for dual tracking. Actually, I think its a really nice application note.... The key is to identify the current flowing through the resistor divider network (R1 - R5).

If R3 = 0, R1 and R5 are tied together and the reference pins are pulled together, putting them to 0V offset through the now parallel connection of R4 and R5.

If you want to fix R3, calculate half its value in parallel R2 and R4.

Bakmeel
__________________
More Power Igor! More Power!
  Reply With Quote
Old 19th February 2009, 03:39 AM   #7
okapi is offline okapi  United States
diyAudio Member
 
okapi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Buffalo
Default prototype up and running

leadbelly and bakmeel, thank you for your replies.

i now have a working prototype

Click the image to open in full size.

i have not tested it's tracking but i will do so soon.

i have to admit that i still don't quite understand the circuit but, i do at least know how to calculate the output voltage based on the value of the trim pot.

i am planning on increasing the stability of the supply by incorporating the following typical implementation circuit from the data sheet into the tracking regulator circuit.

Click the image to open in full size.

i don't have the voltage reference in hand yet so it might be a while before i get the chance to try it.

after i build a point to point version i plan on designing and ordering circuit boards. This supply will form the basis for the buffers i have in the works (B1 and a LME49710 based buffer).

if i can find a negative regulator that is pin compatible and can handle higher output amperage it might work for my chip amps as well.
  Reply With Quote
Old 19th February 2009, 11:19 AM   #8
Bakmeel is offline Bakmeel  Netherlands
diyAudio Member
 
Bakmeel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: The Netherlands
Good work okapi,

Try to approach the regulator as follows: It will work to maintain a voltage difference between OUT and ADJ of 1.25V, based on its internal reference. It will adjust the current passing to the output as a function of the current flowing into the ADJ pin.

Work your way through the resistor network based on the constant 1.25V, and you'll find how the remaining currents flow and why. It's not difficult at all..

The additional voltage reference is a nice trick to improve stability.

For your benefit: put some ceramic capacitors (typically 100nF) parallel to the output capacitors. Put them physically close to the regulator, and minimise the track distance to the ceramic from the OUT pin and GND. Keep GND close to the input and output (or use a double sided PCB with a ground plane).
The ceramic cap will short high frequency noise generated by the regulator
__________________
More Power Igor! More Power!
  Reply With Quote
Old 20th February 2009, 04:18 AM   #9
okapi is offline okapi  United States
diyAudio Member
 
okapi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Buffalo
bakmeel -

in regards to your capacitor comment the data sheet for the lt1033 says the following:

"An output capacitor, C3, is required to provide proper frequency compensation of the regulator feedback loop. A 2uF or larger solid tantalum capacitor is generally sufficient for this purpose if the 1MHz impedance of the capacitor is 1W or less. High Q capacitors, such as Mylar, are not recommended because their extremely low ESR (effective series resistance) can drastically reduce phase margin. When these types of capacitors must be used because of other considerations, add a 0.5W carbon resistor in series with 1uF. Aluminum electrolytic capacitors may be used, but the minimum value should be 25uF to ensure a low impedance at 1MHz. The output capacitor should be located within a few inches of the regulator to keep lead impedance to a minimum"

i don't know the what the important differences in specifications are for tantalum and ceramic caps with the same capacitance and voltage ratings.

Should i substitute the ceramic for the tantalums or use the ceramics after the tantalums? I also have hundreds of 0.1 uF polypropylene caps, could i use those?

i also noticed that some power supplies also have much larger caps after the regulators, 1000 uF or more. when is this sort of configuration necessary?

thanks again!
  Reply With Quote
Old 20th February 2009, 11:28 AM   #10
Bakmeel is offline Bakmeel  Netherlands
diyAudio Member
 
Bakmeel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: The Netherlands
Solid Tantalum generally has a poor impedance (high ESR) and works well as buffer capacitance. It is true that in some cases a high Q capacitor can cause loop instability, but a 100nF ceramic is not large enough to make a difference in the loop stability.

You may keep the electrolytics you're using now, or replace them with tantalums. It won't make a difference. Film caps instead of ceramics is no problem either, as long as you keep them small enough.

Power supplies with large capacitances are best when you're expecting large variations in load currents. They are also commonly used in hi-fi audio as an eye-catcher or just to exgagerate
__________________
More Power Igor! More Power!
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Regulated Lab DC power supply Sir Trefor Tubes / Valves 6 28th July 2007 06:13 PM
Tracking power supply ionutgaga Class D 24 17th May 2007 04:20 AM
regulated power supply adason Swap Meet 1 11th December 2005 06:32 PM
Dual 15V Regulated Supply ble0t Parts 7 1st September 2004 01:28 AM
high-voltage regulated dual power supply zzz Solid State 1 17th September 2002 01:15 AM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 08:43 AM.


vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright 1999-2014 diyAudio

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2