|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Paris
|
The idea about this reg came in another thread, with a misleading title (Zener regulator with "integrated" pre-regulator ), so I'll post it here.
As said in the title, the sources of inspiration are the Jung regulators article and the "Flea" regulator designed by Martin Clark on PFM. From Jung, I took the ccs for the pass transistor. From Martin Clark, the idea of using a 3pins reg as ccs for the voltage reference. If anyone sees obvious errors or improvements (keeping in mind that it's supposed to stay cheaper than a full-blown Jung), I'd be glad to hear them before breadbording the reg.
__________________
Ben. |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Scottish Borders
|
Hi,
what would happen if you doubled up D1 or replaced it with a LED? Is 5.4mA passing R6 enough? What about some noise attenuation cap across the Zener? and a big cap on the adj pin?
__________________
regards Andrew T. |
|
|
|
#3 | |||
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Paris
|
Quote:
- swap D1 and D2 to reduce the dropout by around 1V but then the input voltage from the reference would be close to the rail, certainly too close (2V). - or replace D1 by a led and the ne5534 will work in a safer area. Quote:
Quote:
A big cap from adjust to ground would certainly improve the performance of the prereg, which is good for the error amp. But then, I need to add protection diodes, to protect the lm317. So, what needs to be changed: - change D1 for a led, - adjust R6 according to the bd139 at hand, - add a cap at the adjust pin (100uf being ok), - add a pair of protection diodes around the lm317 (1n4001).
__________________
Ben. |
|||
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Quote:
... and then you can supply the opamp from the regulated output for even better performance. Jan Didden
__________________
/Another new issue: Linear Audio Volume 3! |
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: the north
|
Quote:
And one of the main features of Jung Super Regulator. In this schematic, originally drawn for keantoken in this topic: http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/showt...99#post1551799 .. I use the output to fead the REFERENCE Red LED. This is a great improvement to many other ways ![]() Feeding the complete op-amp, discrete or chip op, from the output is even better, of course!
__________________
lineup |
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Paris
|
Quote:
Now, it might work if : - I use the 5534 with some gain (which means another extra cap to reduce ac gain at unity). - change D1 for a zener (and I probably must bypass it). - change D4 for something like a 6.2V zener and D2 by a 12V zener. I'm affraid of startup problems with such a configuration
__________________
Ben. |
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Quote:
No it isn't working unity gain. If you replace D1 with a zener of about half the Vout, the opamp output will sit neatly halfway the supply. Not often that you get a chance to increase performance for essentially zero cost Start-up *may* be an issue, but that can be cured easily. It's worth a try. Edit: Even if you don't supply the opamp from the regulated output, it is still advisable to bias the opamp output midway of the supply voltage. Jan Didden
__________________
/Another new issue: Linear Audio Volume 3! |
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Paris
|
Please forgive me but I wasn't clear again. I had not in mind the output voltage of the opamp, but of the regulator. What happen if my opamp is powered by 16.7V and the reference voltage is also 16.7V ??
The answer of LTspice is : it doesn't work (unless doing the changes described above). Btw, you're right to correct me, the opamp isn't at unity
__________________
Ben. |
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Paris
|
A schematic is better than a lot of words. Those two seem to work in the simulator.
__________________
Ben. |
|
|
|
#10 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Scottish Borders
|
I prefer your new circuit.
But change R7 to 510r.
__________________
regards Andrew T. |
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| yes, another jung regulator, i know | geekysuavo | Power Supplies | 8 | 25th September 2009 12:29 PM |
| Jung Super Regulator | audionut | Solid State | 5 | 7th August 2009 01:07 PM |
| Problems with a Jung regulator | Gluca | Solid State | 4 | 19th February 2009 01:40 PM |
| WTB: Jung Super Regulator PCB's | vadimgal | Swap Meet | 4 | 29th May 2005 06:04 PM |
| Modified Jung regulator... | Htguy | Digital Source | 4 | 31st March 2005 03:31 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.12656 seconds (75.28% PHP - 24.72% MySQL) with 11 queries |