|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Pass Labs This forum is dedicated to Pass Labs discussion. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#21 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Sierra Foothills - California
|
Hi Cheff,
I have a couple of questions about your V3 circuit: 1) Why did you use a 1K load resistor on the output instead of a higher value? With 7ma of bias on the output transistors and a +-17V swing it seems like the transistors would be a bit starved for current at full swing. What did your simulation say? Did you use the low resistor value to reduce the absolute DC offset? With your load in parallel with the 1K resistor the total load will be even worse. Did you simulate the total load? 2) What did you find was the range of adjustment (in mv) with each of the two pots? Thank you. Graeme |
|
|
|
|
#22 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: This Universe, I think
|
Quote:
OK, that's a real couple Well, I had to make a compromise here again, since the output impedance depends on this value (roughly Rout/2). A higher value leads to a higher Zout, which I found to be undesirable for a preamp. But Rout also affects the open loop gain, which increases as Rout increases. With a 10K pot at output, it doesn't affect Zout that much, so total load won't have a great influence. Rout also helps stabilizing the output offset, providing a reference to ground to the collectors junction when the outputs are unloaded (no pot), and a higher value would have increase the offset instability as it amplifies any difference between the collectors currents (Rout x Idiff) So it's all about compromises, but my main concern was to keep a relatively low Zout. And luckily, this value seems to have more advantages than drawbacks For the offset range, I haven't paid much attention to the limit values, but my bad memory seems to say something like +/-20mV for both... But I may be wrong here, so I'll try to check... Oh my god... I'll have to detune this fabulous offset I've been hunting for so long ... ![]() Regards
__________________
/Cheff - Falling feels like flying, until you hit the ground |
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
|
Hello Cheff - thank you for your reply.
It was, in fact, your suggestion to consider transistors, other than the Zetex, that saved me. My ICAPs models for the Zetex must have been corrupt or highly incorrect (inappropriately applied?). When I replaced the models with Linear BC550/560 part models, which I downloaded from their website, the circuit suddenly sprung to life and simulations now make sense. I have just a couple questions for you: 1) Do you have any suggestions for designing for a SE input to SE out? I believe reducing the Rout to 500-ohms will help in that case, but the output swing is reduced by 1/2 (1/4 of balanced swing). Also, I simulate a slight differential offset when the negative input is grounded for SE operation. Any ideas how to add options to improve the output swing and/or diff offset in SE operation? 2) I’m curious why you chose to use the level-shifter current-mirror for output stage and not a FET, like in many other designs. Isn’t the linearity of the FET better when well biased? Did you get a chance to test the different emitter resistor values? 3) I simulated a 0.063% THD at 1K. Seems a bit high. Is that about you’re your sims showed? I know you measured quite a bit lower with the soundcard. 4) What are you using for PS? Why no local capacitors on the preamp boards? How about a LP filter on the input supplies? 5) Would gate-stoppers be prudent on the JFETs (~100-ohms)? I’m not sure they’re needed for RF on JFETs, but I’ve seen them used. 6) What are you using for volume control at the output? Did you say 10K pot? I was thinking a vol ladder, something like the twisted-pair JT. 7) Do you have a .pdf layout available for the V3 design yet? Sorry for the seven x’s seven questions. Anything you can provide will help. Thanks, Willus |
|
|
|
|
#24 | ||||||||||
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: This Universe, I think
|
Quote:
Quote:
![]() Quote:
Balanced/Unbalanced (sorry, english is not my native language... Nobody's perfect) And why would you like to reduce Rout ? The offset you simulate in unbalanced mode, is it a static or dynamic one ? I got no static offset when grounding one input in my sims. And if I plot (V(out+)+V(out-)) in transient analysis (one input grouded), I get for example a 25mV pp signal with a 6.5V pp. Is it what you call an offset ? Quote:
far better than mosfets. Mosfet biasing was thermally limited by the E-line package dissipation capabilities, but mostly by the offset unstability when the mosfets were too hot. But you're welcome to try And I will test different emitter resistor values, but give me one week or two to listen to music Quote:
soundcard Quote:
There's no local caps, but the supply's output caps are close to the module : ![]() The supply's on the right of the module (old ones feel the need for additional caps, nor of an additionnal ps filter. Quote:
resistors. But I have very short tracks on the pcb, so it may help. But feel free to use some if you think it's more prudent. Or add a ferrite bead on each gate lead before soldering the fets. Quote:
it is hidden by the supply and the module), with a constant input impedance of 10K : ![]() Errr, what's a JT ? ![]() Quote:
Quote:
__________________
/Cheff - Falling feels like flying, until you hit the ground |
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: This Universe, I think
|
So here is the pdf file for the pcb.
UGS V3 PCB Sorry, but it's double-sided These are mirrored pcbs, so be careful before going U.V. I added room for some compensation caps (CFB) if you happen to see some overshoot on square signals. Just in case, as I didn't find them necessary on my version... Enjoy.
__________________
/Cheff - Falling feels like flying, until you hit the ground |
|
|
|
|
#26 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Merci, Cheff.
|
|
|
|
|
#27 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Paris - France
|
CheffDeGaar,
UGS V3 PCB Wouahhhh, such a great job, will save me hours of design, Thanks so much!!! Alain. |
|
|
|
|
#28 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Calgary, Alberta
|
Cheff,
Congratulation on your very well implemented circuit. You make me want to upgrade from my X-BoSoZ. That last photo is a doozy, you spent a great deal of effort on integrating your circuitry together, and I'm impressed and jealous! Care to post a few more?!? Cheers, Terry |
|
|
|
|
#29 | |
|
Banned
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#30 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: This Universe, I think
|
Thanks gentlemen
![]() So some photos of my last toy (old ugs modules inside at the time of photographs) ![]() ![]() ![]() And how it glows in the dark ![]() But do not forget the important things here are the little heatsinked stamps Regards,
__________________
/Cheff - Falling feels like flying, until you hit the ground |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.14584 seconds (84.75% PHP - 15.25% MySQL) with 11 queries |