Pearl Two

Attachments

  • 20221119_125037.jpg
    20221119_125037.jpg
    294.6 KB · Views: 125
@dezibaby

Hallo und Grüße!

Dies ist ein englischsprachiges Forum, können Sie bitte auf Englisch posten? Die Verwendung webbasierter Übersetzungen wie Google Translate ist zulässig. Vielen Dank.


~~~

Hello and greetings!

This is a english-language forum, can you please post in english? The use of web-based translation such as Google Translate is acceptable. Thank you.
Hello 6L6, I also sent in English, this happened due to the activated automatic translation. I can't see this. Am I classified as a criminal here now? Thanks
 

6L6

Moderator
Joined 2010
Paid Member
@dezibaby

The automatic quotation is no problem at all. :)

Verify U1 pin 3 is +24V
Verify U2 pin 3 is -24V

What are values -

Q1 vE

Q2 vK
Q2 vE

Voltage across R21

Does P1 operate normally? Can you set 1.5V across R6? Do you have 0v at R16/R17 node?

Is the error on one PCB or both?

Please post a series of well-lit, in-focus photos.
 
@dezibaby

The automatic quotation is no problem at all. :)

Verify U1 pin 3 is +24V
Verify U2 pin 3 is -24V

What are values -

Q1 vE

Q2 vK
Q2 vE

Voltage across R21

Does P1 operate normally? Can you set 1.5V across R6? Do you have 0v at R16/R17 node?

Is the error on one PCB or both?

Please post a series of well-lit, in-focus photos.
Hello 6L6, checked: U1 P3 +24V, U2 P3 -23.6V, where Pad1 is +33.2V, Pad7 is -34.1V. If I separate the power supply from Pearl then +35.7V/-35.5V. If I set 1.5V across R6, then there are 8.2V on node R16/R17. The circuit boards are from Pass. Actually, apart from the Q3 regime, everything is more or less correct. The voltages on R21-R24 where 20 ohms resistor is installed are 0.12V, in the channel where 10 ohms are left are 0.6V, too much. The only thing I can imagine is that I broke both Q3s when I built them in. Then the reduction of R10 would not have reacted that way, would it? Regards.
 
Replace Q2

ZVP3310 is very sensitive to static electricity during construction, this is a common problem.
Hello 6L6, the ZVP3310 are here, installed, no changes. Actually working regime with grounded signal is not so bad: for Q3 Ue-7.0V; Ub-7.7V; Uk-7.8V means that Q3 is already open. If I set Zero to 0.0V I have 1.7V on R6. Conversely, if U set 1.5V on R6, I have 8.1V on Zero. One can be content with 1.7V on R6, right? Uled=1.7V. What bothers me is that the Q6-Q9 are biased to 0.12V with a 20 ohm resistor. Way too much. If I put the R21-R24 back in 10 ohms, then Q3 is closed again: Ub>Uk. My questions: -can I make R10 even smaller? -does what if I increase R9? Thanks very much!
 
The voltages on R21-R24 where 20 ohms resistor is installed are 0.12V, in the channel where 10 ohms are left are 0.6V, too much.
Looks like your Q6-Q9 devices have an Idss of about 10 ma which is higher than the original design, but it appears you have made the necessary adjustments around Q3, Vec of about 1 volt.

Adjust P1 to get minimum voltage at the output at R17. You are well within the tolerances of the devices. You just needed a higher gate to source voltage on Q2 to match the current coming from Q11. when the current from Q2 equals the current from Q11 the voltage is zero.
 
Looks like your Q6-Q9 devices have an Idss of about 10 ma which is higher than the original design, but it appears you have made the necessary adjustments around Q3, Vec of about 1 volt.

Adjust P1 to get minimum voltage at the output at R17. You are well within the tolerances of the devices. You just needed a higher gate to source voltage on Q2 to match the current coming from Q11. when the current from Q2 equals the current from Q11 the voltage is zero.
Thanks very much! I will get back to you.
 
Looks like your Q6-Q9 devices have an Idss of about 10 ma which is higher than the original design, but it appears you have made the necessary adjustments around Q3, Vec of about 1 volt.

Adjust P1 to get minimum voltage at the output at R17. You are well within the tolerances of the devices. You just needed a higher gate to source voltage on Q2 to match the current coming from Q11. when the current from Q2 equals the current from Q11 the voltage is zero.
Hi all. I reduced R9 to 450 ohms and now at Q3 I have Uk>Ub. Actually it's okay. Only voltage drop to R6=1.7V at Uzero=0V. But I see that I also have Uled in equal value. Because of this! I'm now looking for suitable Led's that bring 1.5V drop. Regards.
 
Replace Q2

ZVP3310 is very sensitive to static electricity during construction, this is a common problem.
Hello everyone, adjusting the LED diode was nothing, because I read in time from Dad that a voltage drop of 1.7V is the reference voltage. Since I applied the Resistor's to adjust. After a long back and forth I have the values at Q3: Ue=9.1V; Ub=9.8V; Uk=9.9V. This worked with R10=8.7kOhm and R9=407 Ohm. Uzero stays around +-30mV, but before +-15mV. It might ring for success if Ur6 didn't equal 1.8V and bias on R21-R24 equaled 70mV. Is that bad? Thanks.
 
I built the version largely using the recommended components and leaving out C7 which had been determined provided no benefit. Early on I had a couple of ZTX450 failures, otherwise it has gone perfectly. My diagnostic skills are not world beating and the voltages that someone posted quite some time ago (see attached) were very helpful.
I recently rebuilt the chassis using a recycled component. I would think the approach would be easy to duplicate. The central panel that holds the PCBs stabilises the ends and the black top slides over it all and is held by screws in the bottom. A sheet metal specialist should be able to make it easily -- the bottom and ends could be folded from one piece
 

Attachments

  • Pearl2Vol.jpg
    Pearl2Vol.jpg
    254.8 KB · Views: 123
  • IMG_20221124_120127.jpg
    IMG_20221124_120127.jpg
    447.3 KB · Views: 118
  • IMG_20221124_120142.jpg
    IMG_20221124_120142.jpg
    379.2 KB · Views: 94
  • IMG_20221124_120156.jpg
    IMG_20221124_120156.jpg
    368.7 KB · Views: 94
  • IMG_20221124_120342.jpg
    IMG_20221124_120342.jpg
    386.4 KB · Views: 121